chr18-12358662-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_006796.3(AFG3L2):​c.1026+8G>A variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0248 in 1,613,348 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 588 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.023 ( 61 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.025 ( 527 hom. )

Consequence

AFG3L2
NM_006796.3 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.0001617
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.171

Publications

5 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
AFG3L2 (HGNC:315): (AFG3 like matrix AAA peptidase subunit 2) This gene encodes a protein localized in mitochondria and closely related to paraplegin. The paraplegin gene is responsible for an autosomal recessive form of hereditary spastic paraplegia. This gene is a candidate gene for other hereditary spastic paraplegias or neurodegenerative disorders. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
AFG3L2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • spinocerebellar ataxia type 28
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Illumina, Genomics England PanelApp
  • spastic ataxia 5
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • optic atrophy 12
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.69).
BP6
Variant 18-12358662-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr18-12358662-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 136313.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0231 (3523/152324) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.0307 (2086/68020). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0296. There are 61 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 1792 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 61 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
AFG3L2NM_006796.3 linkc.1026+8G>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 8 of 16 ENST00000269143.8 NP_006787.2 Q9Y4W6Q8TA92
AFG3L2XM_011525601.4 linkc.1026+8G>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 8 of 15 XP_011523903.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
AFG3L2ENST00000269143.8 linkc.1026+8G>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 8 of 16 1 NM_006796.3 ENSP00000269143.2 Q9Y4W6

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0232
AC:
3524
AN:
152206
Hom.:
61
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00492
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0395
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0213
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0665
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00972
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0501
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0285
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0307
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0259
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0245
AC:
6104
AN:
249578
AF XY:
0.0243
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00480
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0164
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0618
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0500
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0297
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0264
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0250
AC:
36528
AN:
1461024
Hom.:
527
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0249
AC XY:
18096
AN XY:
726770
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00353
AC:
118
AN:
33466
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0180
AC:
805
AN:
44648
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0618
AC:
1613
AN:
26104
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39696
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00822
AC:
708
AN:
86162
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0454
AC:
2421
AN:
53354
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0286
AC:
165
AN:
5760
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0263
AC:
29227
AN:
1111462
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0244
AC:
1471
AN:
60372
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.471
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1782
3564
5346
7128
8910
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
1042
2084
3126
4168
5210
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0231
AC:
3523
AN:
152324
Hom.:
61
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0241
AC XY:
1792
AN XY:
74490
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00491
AC:
204
AN:
41582
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0212
AC:
324
AN:
15300
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0665
AC:
231
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5192
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00973
AC:
47
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0501
AC:
532
AN:
10612
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0272
AC:
8
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0307
AC:
2086
AN:
68020
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0261
AC:
55
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
182
364
547
729
911
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
46
92
138
184
230
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0274
Hom.:
118
Bravo
AF:
0.0204
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00231
AC:
8
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 12, 2017
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 19, 2013
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
Feb 26, 2016
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 02, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

AFG3L2-related disorder Benign:1
Sep 13, 2019
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Spinocerebellar ataxia type 28 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.69
CADD
Benign
2.5
DANN
Benign
0.63
PhyloP100
-0.17
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.00016
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.016
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs8091858; hg19: chr18-12358661; API