chr18-31542655-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001943.5(DSG2):c.2137G>A(p.Glu713Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0674 in 1,614,098 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4,307 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. E713A) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001943.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001943.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DSG2 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.2137G>A | p.Glu713Lys | missense | Exon 14 of 15 | ENSP00000261590.8 | Q14126 | ||
| DSG2 | c.2128G>A | p.Glu710Lys | missense | Exon 15 of 16 | ENSP00000519121.1 | A0AAQ5BGZ7 | |||
| DSG2 | c.2128G>A | p.Glu710Lys | missense | Exon 16 of 17 | ENSP00000519123.1 | A0AAQ5BGZ7 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0531 AC: 8079AN: 152096Hom.: 284 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0529 AC: 13204AN: 249434 AF XY: 0.0525 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0689 AC: 100729AN: 1461884Hom.: 4023 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0672 AC XY: 48888AN XY: 727242 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0531 AC: 8078AN: 152214Hom.: 284 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0533 AC XY: 3964AN XY: 74414 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at