chr18-31598591-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points: 0P and 18B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2_Supporting

The NM_000371.4(TTR):​c.360C>T​(p.Ser120Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00112 in 1,613,994 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 48 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0018 ( 9 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0011 ( 39 hom. )

Consequence

TTR
NM_000371.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:20

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.83

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TTR (HGNC:12405): (transthyretin) This gene encodes one of the three prealbumins, which include alpha-1-antitrypsin, transthyretin and orosomucoid. The encoded protein, transthyretin, is a homo-tetrameric carrier protein, which transports thyroid hormones in the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid. It is also involved in the transport of retinol (vitamin A) in the plasma by associating with retinol-binding protein. The protein may also be involved in other intracellular processes including proteolysis, nerve regeneration, autophagy and glucose homeostasis. Mutations in this gene are associated with amyloid deposition, predominantly affecting peripheral nerves or the heart, while a small percentage of the gene mutations are non-amyloidogenic. The mutations are implicated in the etiology of several diseases, including amyloidotic polyneuropathy, euthyroid hyperthyroxinaemia, amyloidotic vitreous opacities, cardiomyopathy, oculoleptomeningeal amyloidosis, meningocerebrovascular amyloidosis and carpal tunnel syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]
TTR Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • amyloidosis, hereditary systemic 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
  • familial amyloid neuropathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • hereditary ATTR amyloidosis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • heart conduction disease
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • ATTRV122I amyloidosis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.66).
BP6
Variant 18-31598591-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr18-31598591-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 43453.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3.83 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00178 (271/152254) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.0336 (174/5174). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0295. There are 9 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 144 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 271 AD gene. Variant has AC lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000371.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
TTR
NM_000371.4
MANE Select
c.360C>Tp.Ser120Ser
synonymous
Exon 4 of 4NP_000362.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
TTR
ENST00000237014.8
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.360C>Tp.Ser120Ser
synonymous
Exon 4 of 4ENSP00000237014.4
TTR
ENST00000649620.1
c.360C>Tp.Ser120Ser
synonymous
Exon 6 of 6ENSP00000497927.1
TTR
ENST00000610404.5
TSL:5
c.264C>Tp.Ser88Ser
synonymous
Exon 4 of 4ENSP00000477599.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00179
AC:
273
AN:
152138
Hom.:
9
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000869
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00183
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0339
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00394
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000882
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00335
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00310
AC:
778
AN:
251014
AF XY:
0.00295
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00105
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0380
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000176
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00294
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00105
AC:
1540
AN:
1461740
Hom.:
39
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00101
AC XY:
738
AN XY:
727190
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000568
AC:
19
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000894
AC:
4
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0246
AC:
977
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00170
AC:
147
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53274
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000173
AC:
1
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000468
AC:
52
AN:
1112010
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00563
AC:
340
AN:
60392
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.470
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
107
214
320
427
534
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
32
64
96
128
160
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00178
AC:
271
AN:
152254
Hom.:
9
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00193
AC XY:
144
AN XY:
74450
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000866
AC:
36
AN:
41556
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00183
AC:
28
AN:
15304
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0336
AC:
174
AN:
5174
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00394
AC:
19
AN:
4820
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10606
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00340
AC:
1
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000882
AC:
6
AN:
68004
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00331
AC:
7
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.495
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
12
25
37
50
62
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000818
Hom.:
8
Bravo
AF:
0.00165
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0380
AC:
131
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:20
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:8
Mar 11, 2015
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Ser120Ser in exon 4 of TTR: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it has been identified in 3.5% (300/8636) of East Asian chromos omes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs150127220).

Nov 19, 2021
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 15, 2017
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:5
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jun 22, 2016
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: The TTR c.360C>T (p.Ser120Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving a non-conserved nucleotide with 5/5 splice prediction tools predicting no significant impact on splicing and ESE finder predicts changes of binding motifs for RNA splicing enhancers, although these predictions have yet to be functionally assessed. The variant of interest was observed in the large, broad control population, ExAC, with an allele frequency of 339/121120 (1/357, 7 homozygotes), which significantly exceeds the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic TTR variant of 1/31948 (0.0000313), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories classified this variant as benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign.

Nov 30, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Amyloidosis, hereditary systemic 1 Benign:3
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Oct 18, 2021
Molecular Genetics Laboratory, BC Children's and BC Women's Hospitals
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Jul 10, 2017
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

TTR-related disorder Benign:1
May 29, 2019
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Dec 18, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.66
CADD
Benign
0.16
DANN
Benign
0.61
PhyloP100
-3.8
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs150127220; hg19: chr18-29178554; COSMIC: COSV52701674; COSMIC: COSV52701674; API