chr18-70020624-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_173630.4(RTTN):c.6144A>G(p.Val2048Val) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.198 in 1,612,234 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 32,809 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_173630.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.169 AC: 25642AN: 152118Hom.: 2389 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.191 AC: 47546AN: 248918Hom.: 4854 AF XY: 0.200 AC XY: 27063AN XY: 135026
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.201 AC: 292984AN: 1459998Hom.: 30424 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.203 AC XY: 147590AN XY: 726224
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.168 AC: 25629AN: 152236Hom.: 2385 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.169 AC XY: 12564AN XY: 74420
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
not provided Benign:2
- -
- -
Microcephalic primordial dwarfism due to RTTN deficiency Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at