chr19-10987721-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_001387283.1(SMARCA4):c.915G>A(p.Pro305=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00245 in 1,609,678 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 70 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P305P) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001387283.1 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMARCA4 | NM_001387283.1 | c.915G>A | p.Pro305= | synonymous_variant | 6/36 | ENST00000646693.2 | |
SMARCA4 | NM_003072.5 | c.915G>A | p.Pro305= | synonymous_variant | 6/35 | ENST00000344626.10 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMARCA4 | ENST00000646693.2 | c.915G>A | p.Pro305= | synonymous_variant | 6/36 | NM_001387283.1 | |||
SMARCA4 | ENST00000344626.10 | c.915G>A | p.Pro305= | synonymous_variant | 6/35 | 1 | NM_003072.5 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0129 AC: 1956AN: 151800Hom.: 36 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00323 AC: 765AN: 236996Hom.: 18 AF XY: 0.00239 AC XY: 311AN XY: 129904
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00136 AC: 1988AN: 1457760Hom.: 35 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00120 AC XY: 871AN XY: 725030
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0129 AC: 1963AN: 151918Hom.: 35 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0127 AC XY: 945AN XY: 74272
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 01, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | - | Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Jun 19, 2021 | - - |
Intellectual disability, autosomal dominant 16 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 15, 2021 | - - |
Rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 20, 2015 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Coffin-Siris syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at