chr19-11024402-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001387283.1(SMARCA4):​c.3045C>T​(p.Gly1015Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00198 in 1,612,958 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0015 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0020 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

SMARCA4
NM_001387283.1 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:16

Conservation

PhyloP100: -4.87

Publications

5 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
SMARCA4 (HGNC:11100): (SWI/SNF related, matrix associated, actin dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily a, member 4) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the SWI/SNF family of proteins and is similar to the brahma protein of Drosophila. Members of this family have helicase and ATPase activities and are thought to regulate transcription of certain genes by altering the chromatin structure around those genes. The encoded protein is part of the large ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complex SNF/SWI, which is required for transcriptional activation of genes normally repressed by chromatin. In addition, this protein can bind BRCA1, as well as regulate the expression of the tumorigenic protein CD44. Mutations in this gene cause rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome type 2. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, May 2012]
SMARCA4 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Coffin-Siris syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet, Illumina
  • intellectual disability, autosomal dominant 16
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • uterine corpus sarcoma
    Inheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • familial rhabdoid tumor
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.6).
BP6
Variant 19-11024402-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-11024402-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 212248.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-4.87 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00154 (235/152310) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00256 (174/68020). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00225. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 120 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 5 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SMARCA4NM_001387283.1 linkc.3045C>T p.Gly1015Gly synonymous_variant Exon 21 of 36 ENST00000646693.2 NP_001374212.1
SMARCA4NM_003072.5 linkc.3045C>T p.Gly1015Gly synonymous_variant Exon 21 of 35 ENST00000344626.10 NP_003063.2 P51532-1A7E2E1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SMARCA4ENST00000646693.2 linkc.3045C>T p.Gly1015Gly synonymous_variant Exon 21 of 36 NM_001387283.1 ENSP00000495368.1 Q9HBD4
SMARCA4ENST00000344626.10 linkc.3045C>T p.Gly1015Gly synonymous_variant Exon 21 of 35 1 NM_003072.5 ENSP00000343896.4 P51532-1
SMARCA4ENST00000643549.1 linkc.3045C>T p.Gly1015Gly synonymous_variant Exon 21 of 35 ENSP00000493975.1 A0A2R8Y4P4
SMARCA4ENST00000541122.6 linkc.3045C>T p.Gly1015Gly synonymous_variant Exon 22 of 35 5 ENSP00000445036.2 P51532-4
SMARCA4ENST00000643296.1 linkc.3045C>T p.Gly1015Gly synonymous_variant Exon 21 of 34 ENSP00000496635.1 P51532-4
SMARCA4ENST00000644737.1 linkc.3045C>T p.Gly1015Gly synonymous_variant Exon 21 of 34 ENSP00000495548.1 P51532-4
SMARCA4ENST00000589677.5 linkc.3045C>T p.Gly1015Gly synonymous_variant Exon 22 of 35 5 ENSP00000464778.1 P51532-3
SMARCA4ENST00000643995.1 linkc.2457C>T p.Gly819Gly synonymous_variant Exon 18 of 32 ENSP00000496004.1 A0A2R8YGG3
SMARCA4ENST00000644963.1 linkc.1689C>T p.Gly563Gly synonymous_variant Exon 14 of 28 ENSP00000495599.1 A0A2R8YG32
SMARCA4ENST00000644065.1 linkc.1770C>T p.Gly590Gly synonymous_variant Exon 14 of 27 ENSP00000493615.1 A0A2R8Y440
SMARCA4ENST00000642350.1 linkc.1530C>T p.Gly510Gly synonymous_variant Exon 13 of 27 ENSP00000495355.1 A0A2R8Y6N0
SMARCA4ENST00000643857.1 linkc.1398C>T p.Gly466Gly synonymous_variant Exon 12 of 25 ENSP00000494159.1 A0A2R8Y526

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00154
AC:
235
AN:
152192
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000628
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00183
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000377
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00256
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00143
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00146
AC:
365
AN:
250350
AF XY:
0.00139
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000618
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000811
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000792
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00265
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00147
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00203
AC:
2963
AN:
1460648
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00202
AC XY:
1466
AN XY:
726636
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000329
AC:
11
AN:
33472
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000894
AC:
40
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26134
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000232
AC:
2
AN:
86252
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000628
AC:
33
AN:
52568
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00208
AC:
12
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00248
AC:
2754
AN:
1111652
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00184
AC:
111
AN:
60380
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.472
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
155
310
464
619
774
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
104
208
312
416
520
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00154
AC:
235
AN:
152310
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00161
AC XY:
120
AN XY:
74474
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000626
AC:
26
AN:
41556
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00183
AC:
28
AN:
15312
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000377
AC:
4
AN:
10624
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00256
AC:
174
AN:
68020
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00142
AC:
3
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.489
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
11
22
34
45
56
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00215
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00158

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:16
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:8
Sep 29, 2021
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26327206) -

May 21, 2021
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

SMARCA4: BP4, BP7, BS1 -

Nov 03, 2021
Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Mar 30, 2017
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Aug 17, 2020
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

not specified Benign:1
Apr 25, 2016
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Intellectual disability, autosomal dominant 16 Benign:1
Jul 15, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome 2 Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome 2;C3553249:Intellectual disability, autosomal dominant 16;C5935610:Otosclerosis 12 Benign:1
May 19, 2023
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Coffin-Siris syndrome Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

SMARCA4-related disorder Benign:1
Mar 11, 2019
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.60
CADD
Benign
4.0
DANN
Benign
0.72
PhyloP100
-4.9
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.8
Mutation Taster
=95/5
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs56101423; hg19: chr19-11135078; COSMIC: COSV100758340; COSMIC: COSV100758340; API