chr19-11116151-T-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 20 ACMG points: 20P and 0B. PS1PM1PM2PP3_StrongPP5_Very_Strong
The NM_000527.5(LDLR):c.1644T>G(p.Asn548Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★★). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely pathogenicin Lovd. Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. NG548N?) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000527.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDLR | NM_000527.5 | c.1644T>G | p.Asn548Lys | missense_variant | 11/18 | ENST00000558518.6 | NP_000518.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDLR | ENST00000558518.6 | c.1644T>G | p.Asn548Lys | missense_variant | 11/18 | 1 | NM_000527.5 | ENSP00000454071.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hypercholesterolemia, familial, 1 Pathogenic:2
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Centre de Génétique Moléculaire et Chromosomique, Unité de génétique de l'Obésité et des Dyslipidémies, APHP, GH Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière / Charles-Foix | Dec 16, 2016 | subject mutated among 2600 FH index cases screened = 1, family member=1 / Software predictions: Damaging - |
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | literature only | LDLR-LOVD, British Heart Foundation | Mar 25, 2016 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at