chr19-11116902-C-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 6 ACMG points: 6P and 0B. PM2PP3PP4PM5
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: NM_000527.5(LDLR):c.1749C>A (p.His583Gln) variant is classified as Likely Pathogenic for Familial Hypercholesterolemia by applying ACMG/AMP evidence codes PM2, PM5, PP3 and PP4 as defined by the ClinGen Familial Hypercholesterolemia Expert Panel LDLR-specific variant curation guidelines (specification version 1.2) on 7 November 2023. The supporting evidence is as follows: PM2: This variant is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD v2.1.1).PP3: REVEL = 0.805. PM5: There is 1 variant in the same codon classified as Pathogenic by these guidelines, NM_000527.5(LDLR):c.1747C>T (p.His583Tyr) (ClinVar ID: 200921).PP4: Variant meets PM2 and is identified in at least 1 index case with DLCN score >=6, after alternative causes of high cholesterol were excluded, from PMID 19318025 (Alonso et al., 2009). LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA10585596/MONDO:0007750/013
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000527.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDLR | NM_000527.5 | c.1749C>A | p.His583Gln | missense_variant | 12/18 | ENST00000558518.6 | NP_000518.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDLR | ENST00000558518.6 | c.1749C>A | p.His583Gln | missense_variant | 12/18 | 1 | NM_000527.5 | ENSP00000454071.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 35
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hypercholesterolemia, familial, 1 Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | literature only | LDLR-LOVD, British Heart Foundation | Mar 25, 2016 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at