chr19-11120427-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 11 ACMG points: 11P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP3_StrongPP5
The NM_000527.5(LDLR):āc.2045T>Cā(p.Leu682Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,828 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. L682F) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000527.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 11 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDLR | NM_000527.5 | c.2045T>C | p.Leu682Pro | missense_variant | 14/18 | ENST00000558518.6 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDLR | ENST00000558518.6 | c.2045T>C | p.Leu682Pro | missense_variant | 14/18 | 1 | NM_000527.5 | P3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461828Hom.: 0 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 727232
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hypercholesterolemia, familial, 1 Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | literature only | LDLR-LOVD, British Heart Foundation | Mar 25, 2016 | - - |
Familial hypercholesterolemia Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 22, 2023 | This sequence change replaces leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, with proline, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 682 of the LDLR protein (p.Leu682Pro). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with clinical features of familial hypercholesterolemia (PMID: 1301956; Invitae). In at least one individual the data is consistent with being in trans (on the opposite chromosome) from a pathogenic variant. This variant is also known as L661P. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 252189). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt LDLR protein function. In summary, the currently available evidence indicates that the variant is pathogenic, but additional data are needed to prove that conclusively. Therefore, this variant has been classified as Likely Pathogenic. - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Feb 02, 2021 | The p.L682P variant (also known as c.2045T>C), located in coding exon 14 of the LDLR gene, results from a T to C substitution at nucleotide position 2045. The leucine at codon 682 is replaced by proline, an amino acid with similar properties. One functional study found impaired transport and reduced enzymatic activity of LDLR protein in a cell line bearing this alteration, however there was an additional unknown LDLR variant in the cell line, and details were limited (Hobbs HH et al. Hum Mutat, 1992;1:445-66). This nucleotide position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at