chr19-1218524-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000455.5(STK11):​c.374+24G>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.134 in 1,604,610 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 19,584 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.20 ( 4150 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.13 ( 15434 hom. )

Consequence

STK11
NM_000455.5 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:1B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.61

Publications

15 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
STK11 (HGNC:11389): (serine/threonine kinase 11) The protein encoded by this gene is a serine/threonine kinase that regulates cell polarity and energy metabolism and functions as a tumor suppressor. Mutations in this gene have been associated with the autosomal dominant Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, as well as with skin, pancreatic, and testicular cancers. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
STK11 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • familial pancreatic carcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
  • Peutz-Jeghers syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, G2P
  • familial ovarian cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.91).
BP6
Variant 19-1218524-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-1218524-G-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 256204.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.394 is higher than 0.05.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000455.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
STK11
NM_000455.5
MANE Select
c.374+24G>T
intron
N/ANP_000446.1
STK11
NM_001407255.1
c.374+24G>T
intron
N/ANP_001394184.1
STK11
NR_176325.1
n.1641+24G>T
intron
N/A

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
STK11
ENST00000326873.12
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.374+24G>T
intron
N/AENSP00000324856.6
STK11
ENST00000652231.1
c.374+24G>T
intron
N/AENSP00000498804.1
STK11
ENST00000585748.3
TSL:3
c.2+24G>T
intron
N/AENSP00000477641.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.197
AC:
30021
AN:
152132
Hom.:
4129
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.369
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0515
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.206
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0954
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.409
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.150
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0778
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.152
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.104
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.180
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.162
AC:
40165
AN:
247810
AF XY:
0.154
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.376
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.215
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0973
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.418
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0759
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.104
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.143
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.128
AC:
185245
AN:
1452360
Hom.:
15434
Cov.:
28
AF XY:
0.126
AC XY:
91159
AN XY:
722988
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.369
AC:
12291
AN:
33296
American (AMR)
AF:
0.213
AC:
9517
AN:
44674
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0962
AC:
2510
AN:
26082
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.420
AC:
16659
AN:
39656
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.139
AC:
11966
AN:
86064
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0761
AC:
3964
AN:
52110
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.119
AC:
676
AN:
5702
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.107
AC:
118592
AN:
1104704
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.151
AC:
9070
AN:
60072
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
8142
16284
24426
32568
40710
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
4756
9512
14268
19024
23780
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.198
AC:
30107
AN:
152250
Hom.:
4150
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.198
AC XY:
14736
AN XY:
74444
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.370
AC:
15358
AN:
41538
American (AMR)
AF:
0.206
AC:
3157
AN:
15302
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0954
AC:
331
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.408
AC:
2115
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.151
AC:
727
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0778
AC:
826
AN:
10614
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.156
AC:
46
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.104
AC:
7103
AN:
68002
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.188
AC:
397
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.499
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1147
2294
3440
4587
5734
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
292
584
876
1168
1460
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.138
Hom.:
4510
Bravo
AF:
0.215

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:3
Jan 17, 2020
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Nov 18, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Jul 10, 2025
GeneKor MSA
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Peutz-Jeghers syndrome Benign:2
Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jul 15, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Squamous cell lung carcinoma Uncertain:1
May 05, 2020
Faculté Pluridciplinaire Nador, Université Mohamed Premier
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing;in vivo

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.91
CADD
Benign
0.0040
DANN
Benign
0.73
PhyloP100
-2.6
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.3
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2075604; hg19: chr19-1218523; COSMIC: COSV58819874; COSMIC: COSV58819874; API