chr19-1219417-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_ModerateBS2

The NM_000455.5(STK11):​c.464+4C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000292 in 1,025,854 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000028 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000029 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

STK11
NM_000455.5 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.003270
2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:8B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.31

Publications

1 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
STK11 (HGNC:11389): (serine/threonine kinase 11) The protein encoded by this gene is a serine/threonine kinase that regulates cell polarity and energy metabolism and functions as a tumor suppressor. Mutations in this gene have been associated with the autosomal dominant Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, as well as with skin, pancreatic, and testicular cancers. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
STK11 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • familial pancreatic carcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
  • Peutz-Jeghers syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, G2P
  • familial ovarian cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.41).
BS2
High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 26 AD gene.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000455.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
STK11
NM_000455.5
MANE Select
c.464+4C>T
splice_region intron
N/ANP_000446.1
STK11
NM_001407255.1
c.464+4C>T
splice_region intron
N/ANP_001394184.1
STK11
NR_176325.1
n.1731+4C>T
splice_region intron
N/A

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
STK11
ENST00000326873.12
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.464+4C>T
splice_region intron
N/AENSP00000324856.6
STK11
ENST00000652231.1
c.464+4C>T
splice_region intron
N/AENSP00000498804.1
STK11
ENST00000585748.3
TSL:3
c.92+4C>T
splice_region intron
N/AENSP00000477641.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000280
AC:
4
AN:
142968
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000254
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000260
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000252
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000153
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00000533
AC:
1
AN:
187526
AF XY:
0.00000990
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000745
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000294
AC:
26
AN:
882886
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
37
AF XY:
0.0000156
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
448506
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
20134
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
33582
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
16256
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000710
AC:
1
AN:
14078
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
71180
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
32140
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000263
AC:
1
AN:
3804
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000319
AC:
21
AN:
657730
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0000883
AC:
3
AN:
33982
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.469
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
3
4
6
7
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000280
AC:
4
AN:
142968
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000288
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
69466
show subpopulations
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000254
AC:
1
AN:
39442
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
14506
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3352
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000260
AC:
1
AN:
3844
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000252
AC:
1
AN:
3976
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
9108
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
308
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000153
AC:
1
AN:
65564
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
1996
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5. (p-value = 0), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.388
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
2
2
3
4
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0000712
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000264

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:8Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Peutz-Jeghers syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:1
Jul 30, 2024
Molecular Pathology, Peter Maccallum Cancer Centre
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jul 15, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:1
Apr 05, 2019
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Nov 15, 2021
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

Mar 11, 2024
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant causes a C>T nucleotide substitution at the +4 position of intron 3 of the STK11 gene. Splice site prediction tools predict that this variant may have a significant impact on RNA splicing. However, this prediction has not been confirmed in published RNA studies. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with hereditary cancer in the literature. This variant has been identified in 1/187526 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.

not provided Uncertain:2
Oct 02, 2024
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The STK11 c.464+4C>T variant has not been reported in individuals with STK11-related conditions in the published literature. The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.0000053 (1/187526 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using software algorithms for the prediction of the effect of nucleotide changes on splicing yielded predictions that this variant may affect proper STK11 mRNA splicing. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant.

May 22, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is denoted STK11 c.464+4C>T or IVS3+4C>T and consists of a C>T nucleotide substitution at the +4 position of intron 3 of the STK11 gene. In silico analysis, which includes splice predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports a deleterious effect. However, in the absence of RNA or functional studies, the actual effect of this variant is unknown. This variant has not, to our knowledge, been published in the literature as a pathogenic or benign germline variant. STK11 c.464+4C>T was not observed in large population cohorts (Lek 2016). Based on currently available evidence, it is unclear whether STK11 c.464+4C>T is a pathogenic or benign variant. We consider it to be a variant of uncertain significance.

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Uncertain:1
Jan 17, 2023
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Familial ovarian cancer Uncertain:1
Oct 15, 2024
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

STK11-related disorder Benign:1
May 22, 2023
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.41
CADD
Benign
12
DANN
Benign
0.83
PhyloP100
2.3
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Mutation Taster
=74/26
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.0033
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.056
SpliceAI score (max)
0.090
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs373167735; hg19: chr19-1219416; API