chr19-1220706-T-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_000455.5(STK11):c.723T>C(p.Ala241Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000466 in 1,609,454 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000045 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
STK11
NM_000455.5 synonymous
NM_000455.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.702
Genes affected
STK11 (HGNC:11389): (serine/threonine kinase 11) The protein encoded by this gene is a serine/threonine kinase that regulates cell polarity and energy metabolism and functions as a tumor suppressor. Mutations in this gene have been associated with the autosomal dominant Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, as well as with skin, pancreatic, and testicular cancers. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.73).
BP6
Variant 19-1220706-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-1220706-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 135927.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr19-1220706-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr19-1220706-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.702 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0000657 (10/152268) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00193 (10/5176). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00105. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 6 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 10 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STK11 | NM_000455.5 | c.723T>C | p.Ala241Ala | synonymous_variant | 5/10 | ENST00000326873.12 | NP_000446.1 | |
STK11 | NM_001407255.1 | c.723T>C | p.Ala241Ala | synonymous_variant | 5/9 | NP_001394184.1 | ||
STK11 | NR_176325.1 | n.1990T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 6/11 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STK11 | ENST00000326873.12 | c.723T>C | p.Ala241Ala | synonymous_variant | 5/10 | 1 | NM_000455.5 | ENSP00000324856.6 | ||
STK11 | ENST00000652231.1 | c.723T>C | p.Ala241Ala | synonymous_variant | 5/9 | ENSP00000498804.1 | ||||
STK11 | ENST00000585748.3 | c.351T>C | p.Ala117Ala | synonymous_variant | 7/12 | 3 | ENSP00000477641.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000657 AC: 10AN: 152150Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
10
AN:
152150
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000182 AC: 44AN: 241134Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000181 AC XY: 24AN XY: 132242
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
44
AN:
241134
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
24
AN XY:
132242
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000446 AC: 65AN: 1457186Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000524 AC XY: 38AN XY: 724642
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
65
AN:
1457186
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
38
AN XY:
724642
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000657 AC: 10AN: 152268Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000806 AC XY: 6AN XY: 74458
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
10
AN:
152268
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
74458
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:16
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Peutz-Jeghers syndrome Benign:7
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The STK11 p.Ala241= variant was identified in 9 of 14,208 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.0006) from individuals with breast cancer and was present in 48 of 47,462 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) from healthy individuals (Momozawa 2018). The variant was identified dbSNP (rs533550278) as “with other allele”, ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Color, Ambry Genetics, GeneDx and 2 other submitters and benign by Invitae) and LOVD 3.0 (observed 4x). The variant was identified in control databases in 45 of 269,908 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0002 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: Other in 1 of 6302 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), East Asian in 44 of 18,736 chromosomes (freq: 0.002); it was not observed in the African, Latino, European, Ashkenazi Jewish, Finnish, and South Asian populations. The p.Ala241= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. The variant occurs at a non-highly conserved nucleotide outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 15, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Nov 20, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Apr 14, 2023 | This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Dec 13, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 10, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | May 01, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Jan 11, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 07, 2019 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Aug 05, 2014 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Dec 02, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Apr 29, 2015 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | May 21, 2018 | Variant summary: STK11 c.723T>C alters a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The observed variant frequency within East Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 368 fold above the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in STK11 causing Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome phenotype (6.3e-06), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of East Asian origin. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.723T>C in individuals affected with Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Five clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 and all classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Dec 21, 2022 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at