chr19-1221320-C-T

Position:

chr19-1221320-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 2P and 13B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000455.5(STK11):c.842C>T(p.Pro281Leu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000188 in 1,609,376 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00012 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00019 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

STK11
NM_000455.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.87

Variant links:

Genes affected

STK11 (HGNC:11389): (serine/threonine kinase 11) The protein encoded by this gene is a serine/threonine kinase that regulates cell polarity and energy metabolism and functions as a tumor suppressor. Mutations in this gene have been associated with the autosomal dominant Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, as well as with skin, pancreatic, and testicular cancers. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

STK11 links:

STK11 (HGNC:):

STK11 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.

PM1

In a domain Protein kinase (size 260) in uniprot entity STK11_HUMAN there are 19 pathogenic changes around while only 5 benign (79%) in NM_000455.5

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.018123537).

BP6

Variant 19-1221320-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-1221320-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 142115.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Uncertain_significance=4, Benign=5}. Variant chr19-1221320-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr19-1221320-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000125 (19/152344) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0025 (13/5190). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00148. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 14 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 19 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
STK11	NM_000455.5 linkuse as main transcript	c.842C>T	p.Pro281Leu	missense_variant	6/10	ENST00000326873.12	NP_000446.1	Q15831-1A0A0S2Z4D1
STK11	NM_001407255.1 linkuse as main transcript	c.842C>T	p.Pro281Leu	missense_variant	6/9		NP_001394184.1
STK11	NR_176325.1 linkuse as main transcript	n.2109C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	7/11

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
STK11	ENST00000326873.12 linkuse as main transcript	c.842C>T	p.Pro281Leu	missense_variant	6/10	1	NM_000455.5	ENSP00000324856.6	Q15831-1
STK11	ENST00000652231.1 linkuse as main transcript	c.842C>T	p.Pro281Leu	missense_variant	6/9			ENSP00000498804.1	Q15831-2
STK11	ENST00000585748.3 linkuse as main transcript	c.470C>T	p.Pro157Leu	missense_variant	8/12	3		ENSP00000477641.2	A0A087WT72

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000125

AC:

AN:

152226

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000965

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00250

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000120

AC:

AN:

240870

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000114

AC XY:

AN XY:

131162

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000685

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00148

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000922

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000170

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000195

AC:

284

AN:

1457032

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000189

AC XY:

137

AN XY:

724428

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00667

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000153

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000498

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000125

AC:

AN:

152344

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000188

AC XY:

AN XY:

74492

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000962

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00250

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000526

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000529

ExAC

AF:

0.0000998

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000866

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:10

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Peutz-Jeghers syndrome

Uncertain:2Benign:3

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Mendelics	Aug 22, 2023	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Myriad Genetics, Inc.	Apr 14, 2023	This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genome-Nilou Lab	Jul 15, 2021	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Counsyl	May 26, 2017	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Feb 01, 2024	- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:3

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Ambry Genetics	Dec 07, 2018	This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health	Dec 10, 2020	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	curation	Sema4, Sema4	Feb 06, 2021	- -

not specified

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital	Jul 31, 2024	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp	Feb 07, 2020	STK11 c.842C>T (p.Pro281Leu) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Catalytic domain of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00012 in 240870 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0015 within the East Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within East Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 240 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in STK11 causing Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome phenotype (6.3e-06), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of East Asian origin. The c.842C>T variant has been reported in the literature in sequencing studies of individuals affected with multiple types of cancers (lung, colon, salivary gland, etc) without confirmation as a germline variant and also in one individual with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma as a germline variant (example, Ku_2014, Preusser_2015, Han_2014, Koivunen_2008, Onozato_2007, Jeong_2017, Ohmoto_2016). Additionally a recent Japanese case control association study on 7,051 unselected breast cancer cases and 11,241 female controls showed no association of this variant with breast cancer along with a final assessment as benign (Momozawa_2018). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome or HBOC. At-least two publications report experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function, however, none of these studies allows convincing conclusions about the variant effect (example, Zeqiraj_2009, Launonen_2000). Seven clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Multiple laboratories reported the variant with conflicting assessments (benign, n=1; likely benign, n=2; VUS, n=4). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was re-classified as benign. -

not provided

Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano	Dec 03, 2022	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Feb 15, 2021	In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 9731485, 14687797, 27751357, 25343854, 17711506, 22723903, 10429654, 18594528, 10676634, 26185002, 21191700, 24857785, 26164066, 19892943, 29338689) -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

research

Cancer Genomics Group, Japanese Foundation For Cancer Research

May 01, 2019

- -

Ovarian cancer

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Laboratory of Molecular Epidemiology of Birth Defects, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University

Jan 01, 2022

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.064

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.43

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.40

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.88

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.28

T;T

Eigen

Benign

-0.20

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.0053

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.81

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.95

D;D

M_CAP

Benign

0.021

MetaRNN

Benign

0.018

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.1

.;L

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.60

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.2

.;N

REVEL

Benign

0.058

Sift

Benign

0.47

.;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.38

T;T

Polyphen

0.026

.;B

Vest4

0.38

MVP

0.25

MPC

0.043

ClinPred

0.072

GERP RS

4.2

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.2

Varity_R

0.23

gMVP

0.54

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over