chr19-12893545-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 9 ACMG points: 9P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP3_ModeratePP5
The NM_000159.4(GCDH):c.397G>T(p.Val133Leu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000479 in 1,461,698 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V133M) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000159.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiencyInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Myriad Women’s Health, ClinGen, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 9 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000159.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GCDH | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.397G>T | p.Val133Leu | missense | Exon 6 of 12 | ENSP00000222214.4 | Q92947-1 | ||
| GCDH | TSL:1 | c.397G>T | p.Val133Leu | missense | Exon 5 of 11 | ENSP00000466845.1 | Q92947-1 | ||
| GCDH | TSL:1 | n.762G>T | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 5 of 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 31
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000199 AC: 5AN: 251458 AF XY: 0.0000147 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000479 AC: 7AN: 1461698Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000550 AC XY: 4AN XY: 727160 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 31
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at