chr19-13207401-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 1P and 6B. PP2BP4_ModerateBS2
The NM_001127222.2(CACNA1A):c.7433C>T(p.Pro2478Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000114 in 1,537,168 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001127222.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACNA1A | NM_001127222.2 | c.7433C>T | p.Pro2478Leu | missense_variant | 47/47 | ENST00000360228.11 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACNA1A | ENST00000360228.11 | c.7433C>T | p.Pro2478Leu | missense_variant | 47/47 | 1 | NM_001127222.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000198 AC: 3AN: 151702Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000498 AC: 7AN: 140478Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000514 AC XY: 4AN XY: 77858
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000124 AC: 172AN: 1385466Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000117 AC XY: 80AN XY: 685636
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000198 AC: 3AN: 151702Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74108
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jan 10, 2023 | Available data are insufficient to determine the clinical significance of the variant at this time. The frequency of this variant in the general population is uninformative in assessment of its pathogenicity. (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org) Computational tools predict that this variant is not damaging. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at