chr19-15053540-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points: 6P and 0B. PM2PP3_Strong
The NM_012114.3(CASP14):c.86G>C(p.Arg29Pro) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,886 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R29W) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_012114.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_012114.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CASP14 | NM_012114.3 | MANE Select | c.86G>C | p.Arg29Pro | missense | Exon 3 of 7 | NP_036246.1 | P31944 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CASP14 | ENST00000427043.4 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.86G>C | p.Arg29Pro | missense | Exon 3 of 7 | ENSP00000393417.2 | P31944 | |
| ENSG00000302149 | ENST00000784685.1 | n.233-845C>G | intron | N/A |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461886Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 727244 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at