chr19-15529728-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 5 ACMG points: 5P and 0B. PM2PM5PP3
The NM_173483.4(CYP4F22):c.242G>T(p.Gly81Val) variant causes a missense change. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G81D) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_173483.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal recessive congenital ichthyosis 5Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- lamellar ichthyosisInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 5 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_173483.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYP4F22 | NM_173483.4 | MANE Select | c.242G>T | p.Gly81Val | missense | Exon 4 of 14 | NP_775754.2 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYP4F22 | ENST00000269703.8 | TSL:2 MANE Select | c.242G>T | p.Gly81Val | missense | Exon 4 of 14 | ENSP00000269703.1 | ||
| CYP4F22 | ENST00000601005.2 | TSL:5 | c.242G>T | p.Gly81Val | missense | Exon 2 of 12 | ENSP00000469866.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at