chr19-16576791-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS2
The NM_004831.5(MED26):c.1039A>G(p.Ser347Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000261 in 1,455,932 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004831.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_004831.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MED26 | NM_004831.5 | MANE Select | c.1039A>G | p.Ser347Gly | missense | Exon 3 of 3 | NP_004822.2 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MED26 | ENST00000263390.8 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1039A>G | p.Ser347Gly | missense | Exon 3 of 3 | ENSP00000263390.3 | O95402-1 | |
| MED26 | ENST00000611692.4 | TSL:1 | c.*404A>G | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 4 of 4 | ENSP00000484490.1 | O95402-2 | ||
| ENSG00000141979 | ENST00000409035.1 | TSL:2 | n.1063A>G | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 4 of 12 | ENSP00000386951.2 | B8ZZF3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000428 AC: 1AN: 233894 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000261 AC: 38AN: 1455932Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000124 AC XY: 9AN XY: 724236 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at