chr19-33132368-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_173479.4(WDR88):c.199C>T(p.Pro67Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000041 in 1,461,840 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_173479.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_173479.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WDR88 | NM_173479.4 | MANE Select | c.199C>T | p.Pro67Ser | missense | Exon 1 of 11 | NP_775750.3 | ||
| WDR88 | NR_135565.2 | n.255C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 1 of 12 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WDR88 | ENST00000355868.4 | TSL:2 MANE Select | c.199C>T | p.Pro67Ser | missense | Exon 1 of 11 | ENSP00000348129.2 | Q6ZMY6-1 | |
| WDR88 | ENST00000361680.6 | TSL:1 | c.199C>T | p.Pro67Ser | missense | Exon 1 of 12 | ENSP00000355148.2 | Q6ZMY6-2 | |
| WDR88 | ENST00000592765.5 | TSL:5 | c.199C>T | p.Pro67Ser | missense | Exon 1 of 6 | ENSP00000467383.1 | K7EPH1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000410 AC: 6AN: 1461840Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000413 AC XY: 3AN XY: 727230 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at