chr19-33302169-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points: 2P and 0B. PM2
The NM_004364.5(CEBPA):c.246C>A(p.Phe82Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000203 in 1,477,106 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. F82S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004364.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_004364.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CEBPA | NM_004364.5 | MANE Select | c.246C>A | p.Phe82Leu | missense | Exon 1 of 1 | NP_004355.2 | ||
| CEBPA | NM_001287424.2 | c.351C>A | p.Phe117Leu | missense | Exon 1 of 1 | NP_001274353.1 | |||
| CEBPA | NM_001287435.2 | c.204C>A | p.Phe68Leu | missense | Exon 1 of 1 | NP_001274364.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CEBPA | ENST00000498907.3 | TSL:6 MANE Select | c.246C>A | p.Phe82Leu | missense | Exon 1 of 1 | ENSP00000427514.1 | ||
| CEBPA-DT | ENST00000718467.1 | n.46+370G>T | intron | N/A | |||||
| ENSG00000267727 | ENST00000587312.1 | TSL:3 | n.*229G>T | downstream_gene | N/A |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 151470Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000102 AC: 1AN: 98122 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 7.54e-7 AC: 1AN: 1325528Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 653664 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 151578Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74076 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Acute myeloid leukemia Uncertain:2
This sequence change replaces phenylalanine, which is neutral and non-polar, with leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 82 of the CEBPA protein (p.Phe82Leu). The frequency data for this variant in the population databases is considered unreliable, as metrics indicate poor data quality at this position in the gnomAD database. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with CEBPA-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 434685). Invitae Evidence Modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt CEBPA protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
not specified Uncertain:1
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
The p.F82L variant (also known as c.246C>A), located in coding exon 1 of the CEBPA gene, results from a C to A substitution at nucleotide position 246. The phenylalanine at codon 82 is replaced by leucine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This amino acid position is well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Based on the available evidence, the clinical significance of this variant remains unclear.
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at