chr19-35826654-C-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_004646.4(NPHS1):c.3595-9G>T variant causes a splice polypyrimidine tract, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0453 in 1,613,580 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2,074 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.040 ( 180 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.046 ( 1894 hom. )
Consequence
NPHS1
NM_004646.4 splice_polypyrimidine_tract, intron
NM_004646.4 splice_polypyrimidine_tract, intron
Scores
2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00003676
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.301
Genes affected
NPHS1 (HGNC:7908): (NPHS1 adhesion molecule, nephrin) This gene encodes a member of the immunoglobulin family of cell adhesion molecules that functions in the glomerular filtration barrier in the kidney. The gene is primarily expressed in renal tissues, and the protein is a type-1 transmembrane protein found at the slit diaphragm of glomerular podocytes. The slit diaphragm is thought to function as an ultrafilter to exclude albumin and other plasma macromolecules in the formation of urine. Mutations in this gene result in Finnish-type congenital nephrosis 1, characterized by severe proteinuria and loss of the slit diaphragm and foot processes.[provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).
BP6
Variant 19-35826654-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-35826654-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 259501.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr19-35826654-C-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0531 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NPHS1 | NM_004646.4 | c.3595-9G>T | splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000378910.10 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NPHS1 | ENST00000378910.10 | c.3595-9G>T | splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | 1 | NM_004646.4 | P2 | |||
NPHS1 | ENST00000353632.6 | c.3475-9G>T | splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | 5 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0397 AC: 6040AN: 152034Hom.: 180 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
6040
AN:
152034
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0417 AC: 10382AN: 249222Hom.: 335 AF XY: 0.0420 AC XY: 5660AN XY: 134896
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
10382
AN:
249222
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
5660
AN XY:
134896
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0459 AC: 67018AN: 1461428Hom.: 1894 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0458 AC XY: 33273AN XY: 727008
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
67018
AN:
1461428
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
33273
AN XY:
727008
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0397 AC: 6038AN: 152152Hom.: 180 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0417 AC XY: 3099AN XY: 74388
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
6038
AN:
152152
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
3099
AN XY:
74388
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
27
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Mar 26, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 14, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Finnish congenital nephrotic syndrome Benign:2
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 08, 2021 | - - |
Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children | Dec 01, 2017 | - - |
Congenital nephrotic syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at