chr19-36084752-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001083961.2(WDR62):c.1642+8C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00887 in 1,612,156 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 156 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001083961.2 splice_region, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WDR62 | NM_001083961.2 | c.1642+8C>T | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000401500.7 | NP_001077430.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WDR62 | ENST00000401500.7 | c.1642+8C>T | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | 1 | NM_001083961.2 | ENSP00000384792 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0105 AC: 1595AN: 151944Hom.: 12 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0110 AC: 2760AN: 249840Hom.: 33 AF XY: 0.0127 AC XY: 1708AN XY: 135008
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00870 AC: 12701AN: 1460094Hom.: 144 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00976 AC XY: 7089AN XY: 726302
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0105 AC: 1595AN: 152062Hom.: 12 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0112 AC XY: 834AN XY: 74312
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:5
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Nov 20, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Mar 27, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 09, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Microcephaly 2, primary, autosomal recessive, with or without cortical malformations Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Dec 05, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at