chr19-36084752-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001083961.2(WDR62):​c.1642+8C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00887 in 1,612,156 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 156 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.010 ( 12 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0087 ( 144 hom. )

Consequence

WDR62
NM_001083961.2 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00008223
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.00
Variant links:
Genes affected
WDR62 (HGNC:24502): (WD repeat domain 62) This gene is proposed to play a role in cerebral cortical development. Mutations in this gene have been associated with microencephaly, cortical malformations, and cognitive disability. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.87).
BP6
Variant 19-36084752-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-36084752-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 137907.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr19-36084752-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0105 (1595/152062) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0418 (201/4812). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.037. There are 12 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 834 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 12 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
WDR62NM_001083961.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1642+8C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant ENST00000401500.7 NP_001077430.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
WDR62ENST00000401500.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.1642+8C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant 1 NM_001083961.2 ENSP00000384792 P4O43379-4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0105
AC:
1595
AN:
151944
Hom.:
12
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0166
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00709
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0291
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0413
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00161
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0222
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00657
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0148
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0110
AC:
2760
AN:
249840
Hom.:
33
AF XY:
0.0127
AC XY:
1708
AN XY:
135008
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0164
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00454
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0250
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0381
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00205
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00702
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0133
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00870
AC:
12701
AN:
1460094
Hom.:
144
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00976
AC XY:
7089
AN XY:
726302
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0189
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00494
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0261
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000151
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0401
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00243
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00606
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0113
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0105
AC:
1595
AN:
152062
Hom.:
12
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0112
AC XY:
834
AN XY:
74312
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0165
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00708
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0291
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0418
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00161
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00657
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0142
Alfa
AF:
0.00950
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.0106
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0140
AC:
49
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:5
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 29, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsNov 20, 2018- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoMar 27, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 09, 2014This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Microcephaly 2, primary, autosomal recessive, with or without cortical malformations Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabDec 05, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.87
CADD
Benign
0.34
DANN
Benign
0.55

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000082
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0060
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs143309981; hg19: chr19-36575654; COSMIC: COSV54337942; COSMIC: COSV54337942; API