chr19-39480578-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The ENST00000544017.5(TIMM50):c.34G>T(p.Asp12Tyr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000685 in 1,460,642 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D12H) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000544017.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- 3-methylglutaconic aciduria type 9Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TIMM50 | ENST00000544017.5 | c.34G>T | p.Asp12Tyr | missense_variant | Exon 1 of 11 | 1 | ENSP00000445806.2 | |||
TIMM50 | ENST00000601358.5 | n.-276G>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 1 of 10 | 1 | ENSP00000472476.2 | ||||
TIMM50 | ENST00000601358.5 | n.-276G>T | 5_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 1 of 10 | 1 | ENSP00000472476.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.85e-7 AC: 1AN: 1460642Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 726602 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at