chr19-40396309-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1
The NM_181882.3(PRX):c.2043C>T(p.Pro681Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000442 in 1,604,746 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0024 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00025 ( 1 hom. )
Consequence
PRX
NM_181882.3 synonymous
NM_181882.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -7.34
Genes affected
PRX (HGNC:13797): (periaxin) This gene encodes a protein involved in peripheral nerve myelin upkeep. The encoded protein contains 2 PDZ domains which were named after PSD95 (post synaptic density protein), DlgA (Drosophila disc large tumor suppressor), and ZO1 (a mammalian tight junction protein). Two alternatively spliced transcript variants have been described for this gene which encode different protein isoforms and which are targeted differently in the Schwann cell. Mutations in this gene cause Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuoropathy, type 4F and Dejerine-Sottas neuropathy. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.73).
BP6
Variant 19-40396309-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-40396309-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 289454.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-7.34 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0024 (346/144278) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00873 (336/38468). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00797. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 156 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRX | NM_181882.3 | c.2043C>T | p.Pro681Pro | synonymous_variant | 7/7 | ENST00000324001.8 | NP_870998.2 | |
PRX | NM_001411127.1 | c.2328C>T | p.Pro776Pro | synonymous_variant | 7/7 | NP_001398056.1 | ||
PRX | XM_017027047.2 | c.1941C>T | p.Pro647Pro | synonymous_variant | 4/4 | XP_016882536.1 | ||
PRX | NM_020956.2 | c.*2248C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 6/6 | NP_066007.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00241 AC: 347AN: 144166Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
347
AN:
144166
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000633 AC: 159AN: 251114Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000501 AC XY: 68AN XY: 135856
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
159
AN:
251114
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
68
AN XY:
135856
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000249 AC: 364AN: 1460468Hom.: 1 Cov.: 37 AF XY: 0.000227 AC XY: 165AN XY: 726602
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
364
AN:
1460468
Hom.:
Cov.:
37
AF XY:
AC XY:
165
AN XY:
726602
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00240 AC: 346AN: 144278Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00222 AC XY: 156AN XY: 70242
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
346
AN:
144278
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
156
AN XY:
70242
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Aug 26, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 05, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre | - | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 11, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 18, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at