chr19-49168695-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_017636.4(TRPM4):c.755G>A(p.Arg252His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0055 in 1,608,374 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 29 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R252C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_017636.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRPM4 | NM_017636.4 | c.755G>A | p.Arg252His | missense_variant | 6/25 | ENST00000252826.10 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRPM4 | ENST00000252826.10 | c.755G>A | p.Arg252His | missense_variant | 6/25 | 1 | NM_017636.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00417 AC: 633AN: 151962Hom.: 1 Cov.: 30
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00422 AC: 1000AN: 237220Hom.: 5 AF XY: 0.00424 AC XY: 546AN XY: 128698
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00564 AC: 8207AN: 1456412Hom.: 28 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00554 AC XY: 4011AN XY: 724162
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00417 AC: 633AN: 151962Hom.: 1 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00472 AC XY: 350AN XY: 74216
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Progressive familial heart block type IB Uncertain:1Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center | Jan 01, 2019 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jul 30, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 15, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Dec 01, 2023 | TRPM4: BP4, BS2 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Oct 06, 2023 | - - |
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Advanced Laboratory Medicine, UC San Diego Health, University of California San Diego | Apr 17, 2019 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 21, 2015 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at