chr19-50250613-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001145809.2(MYH14):​c.1755C>T​(p.Gly585Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0665 in 1,613,792 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4,603 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.073 ( 529 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.066 ( 4074 hom. )

Consequence

MYH14
NM_001145809.2 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.293

Publications

5 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYH14 (HGNC:23212): (myosin heavy chain 14) This gene encodes a member of the myosin superfamily. The protein represents a conventional non-muscle myosin; it should not be confused with the unconventional myosin-14 (MYO14). Myosins are actin-dependent motor proteins with diverse functions including regulation of cytokinesis, cell motility, and cell polarity. Mutations in this gene result in one form of autosomal dominant hearing impairment. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2011]
MYH14 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 4A
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • peripheral neuropathy-myopathy-hoarseness-hearing loss syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.24).
BP6
Variant 19-50250613-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-50250613-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 44050.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.293 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AMR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.123 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MYH14NM_001145809.2 linkc.1755C>T p.Gly585Gly synonymous_variant Exon 15 of 43 ENST00000642316.2 NP_001139281.1 Q7Z406-2A1L2Z2B3KWH4
MYH14NM_001077186.2 linkc.1755C>T p.Gly585Gly synonymous_variant Exon 15 of 42 NP_001070654.1 Q7Z406-6B3KWH4
MYH14NM_024729.4 linkc.1731C>T p.Gly577Gly synonymous_variant Exon 14 of 41 NP_079005.3 Q7Z406-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYH14ENST00000642316.2 linkc.1755C>T p.Gly585Gly synonymous_variant Exon 15 of 43 NM_001145809.2 ENSP00000493594.1 Q7Z406-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0725
AC:
11023
AN:
152084
Hom.:
522
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0675
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0208
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.127
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0772
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00135
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0371
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.142
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0728
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0603
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0856
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0844
AC:
20990
AN:
248698
AF XY:
0.0780
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0702
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.213
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0756
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.145
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0616
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0853
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0659
AC:
96315
AN:
1461590
Hom.:
4074
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0647
AC XY:
47036
AN XY:
727080
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0676
AC:
2264
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.203
AC:
9077
AN:
44690
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0784
AC:
2048
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000151
AC:
6
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0422
AC:
3636
AN:
86246
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.149
AC:
7953
AN:
53370
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0635
AC:
366
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0602
AC:
66900
AN:
1111832
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0673
AC:
4065
AN:
60368
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.466
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
4706
9412
14118
18824
23530
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
2590
5180
7770
10360
12950
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0726
AC:
11053
AN:
152202
Hom.:
529
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0747
AC XY:
5558
AN XY:
74402
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0677
AC:
2814
AN:
41544
American (AMR)
AF:
0.128
AC:
1956
AN:
15280
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0772
AC:
268
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00154
AC:
8
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0369
AC:
178
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.142
AC:
1505
AN:
10572
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0782
AC:
23
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0603
AC:
4103
AN:
68008
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0847
AC:
179
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.496
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
517
1035
1552
2070
2587
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
130
260
390
520
650
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0651
Hom.:
141
Bravo
AF:
0.0749
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0340
AC:
120
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0622
EpiControl
AF:
0.0588

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 25, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

May 07, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Gly585Gly in Exon 15 of MYH14: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 6.9% (252/3668) of A frican American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencin g Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs61731838). -

not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 4A Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.24
CADD
Benign
5.3
DANN
Benign
0.74
PhyloP100
-0.29
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61731838; hg19: chr19-50753870; COSMIC: COSV51815796; COSMIC: COSV51815796; API