chr19-53259207-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong
The NM_173856.2(VN1R2):c.832C>T(p.Leu278Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000116 in 1,614,152 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_173856.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_173856.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VN1R2 | NM_173856.2 | MANE Select | c.832C>T | p.Leu278Phe | missense | Exon 1 of 1 | NP_776255.2 | Q8NFZ6 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VN1R2 | ENST00000341702.3 | TSL:6 MANE Select | c.832C>T | p.Leu278Phe | missense | Exon 1 of 1 | ENSP00000351244.2 | Q8NFZ6 | |
| VN1R2 | ENST00000598458.1 | TSL:3 | n.-3C>T | upstream_gene | N/A |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000552 AC: 84AN: 152140Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000179 AC: 45AN: 251486 AF XY: 0.000118 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000705 AC: 103AN: 1461894Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000523 AC XY: 38AN XY: 727248 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000552 AC: 84AN: 152258Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000618 AC XY: 46AN XY: 74450 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at