chr19-55159440-C-T

Position:

chr19-55159440-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_001256715.2(DNAAF3):c.1248G>A(p.Val416=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000724 in 1,613,806 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0037 ( 2 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00041 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

DNAAF3
NM_001256715.2 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.445

Variant links:

Genes affected

DNAAF3 (HGNC:30492): (dynein axonemal assembly factor 3) The protein encoded by this gene is required for the assembly of axonemal inner and outer dynein arms and plays a role in assembling dynein complexes for transport into cilia. Defects in this gene are a cause of primary ciliary dyskinesia type 2 (CILD2). Several transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, May 2012]

DNAAF3 links:

DNAAF3-AS1 (HGNC:55292): (DNAAF3 antisense RNA 1)

DNAAF3-AS1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.42).

BP6

Variant 19-55159440-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-55159440-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 257685.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Benign=4, Uncertain_significance=1}.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.445 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00371 (565/152338) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0132 (549/41562). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0123. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 255 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DNAAF3	NM_001256715.2 linkuse as main transcript	c.1248G>A	p.Val416=	synonymous_variant	12/12	ENST00000524407.7	NP_001243644.1
DNAAF3-AS1	XR_007067344.1 linkuse as main transcript	n.132C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	1/4

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
DNAAF3	ENST00000524407.7 linkuse as main transcript	c.1248G>A	p.Val416=	synonymous_variant	12/12	1	NM_001256715.2	ENSP00000432046	A2	Q8N9W5-1
DNAAF3-AS1	ENST00000591665.1 linkuse as main transcript	n.419C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	2/5	2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00371

AC:

565

AN:

152220

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0132

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000589

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00287

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000951

AC:

237

AN:

249212

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000703

AC XY:

AN XY:

135206

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0145

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000290

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000265

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000413

AC:

603

AN:

1461468

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000337

AC XY:

245

AN XY:

726970

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0149

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000470

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000232

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000378

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000613

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00371

AC:

565

AN:

152338

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00342

AC XY:

255

AN XY:

74484

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0132

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000588

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00284

Alfa

AF:

0.00194

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00411

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00173

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000109

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary ciliary dyskinesia

Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Jan 31, 2024	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Ambry Genetics	Dec 22, 2016	This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 2A

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not specified

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

- -

Cardiomyopathy, familial restrictive, 1

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Familial Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy with Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 7

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

not provided

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

GeneDx

Mar 01, 2021

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.42

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.83

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.080

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over