chr19-6495161-A-G

Variant names:

• chr19-6495161-A-G
• rs150446118
• NM_006087.4:c.*3T>C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_Strong BP6_Very_Strong BS1 BS2

The NM_006087.4(TUBB4A):​c.*3T>C variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00168 in 1,613,558 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 43 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0091 (21 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00091 (22 hom.)
• Consequence: TUBB4A NM_006087.4 3_prime_UTR
• Clinical Significance: Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:3
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -0.705

Genes affected

TUBB4A (HGNC:20774): (tubulin beta 4A class IVa) This gene encodes a member of the beta tubulin family. Beta tubulins are one of two core protein families (alpha and beta tubulins) that heterodimerize and assemble to form microtubules. Mutations in this gene cause hypomyelinating leukodystrophy-6 and autosomal dominant torsion dystonia-4. Alternate splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms. A pseudogene of this gene is found on chromosome X. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2014]

ENSG00000268191 (HGNC:):

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.88).
• BP6: Variant 19-6495161-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-6495161-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 384133.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00905 (1377/152134) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0312 (1294/41518). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0298. There are 21 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 639 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High AC in GnomAd4 at 1377 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TUBB4A	NM_006087.4	c.*3T>C		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 4 of 4	ENST00000264071.7	NP_006078.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TUBB4A	ENST00000264071	c.*3T>C		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 4 of 4	1	NM_006087.4	ENSP00000264071.1
ENSG00000268191	ENST00000596027.1	n.*136A>G		downstream_gene_variant		5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00905 AC: 1375 AN: 152016 Hom.: 21 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0312

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00413

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.000207

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0000736

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00721

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00231 AC: 579 AN: 250758 Hom.: 8 AF XY: 0.00165 AC XY: 223 AN XY: 135510

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.0326

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.00107

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.0000980

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.0000177

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00131

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000909 AC: 1328 AN: 1461424 Hom.: 22 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000783 AC XY: 569 AN XY: 726992

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.0332

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00127

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0000812

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0000207

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00189

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00905 AC: 1377 AN: 152134 Hom.: 21 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00859 AC XY: 639 AN XY: 74380

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0312

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00406

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.0000736

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00714

Alfa AF: 0.00462 Hom.: 6

Bravo AF: 0.0105

Asia WGS AF: 0.00115 AC: 4 AN: 3478

EpiCase AF: 0.00

EpiControl AF: 0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:1

Aug 08, 2016

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Torsion dystonia 4 Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Hypomyelinating leukodystrophy 6 Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.88
CADD	Benign	2.2
DANN	Benign	0.64

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs150446118; hg19: chr19-6495172;