chr19-677860-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_005860.3(FSTL3):c.172C>T(p.Arg58Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000217 in 1,613,038 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R58Q) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005860.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_005860.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSTL3 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.172C>T | p.Arg58Trp | missense | Exon 2 of 5 | ENSP00000166139.3 | O95633-1 | ||
| FSTL3 | c.172C>T | p.Arg58Trp | missense | Exon 2 of 4 | ENSP00000575358.1 | ||||
| FSTL3 | c.103+1334C>T | intron | N/A | ENSP00000634261.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152212Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000160 AC: 4AN: 250176 AF XY: 0.00000738 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000226 AC: 33AN: 1460826Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000220 AC XY: 16AN XY: 726712 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152212Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74360 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at