chr19-7113199-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS1BS2
The NM_000208.4(INSR):c.*3857C>T variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0124 in 151,844 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 42 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.012 ( 42 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0 ( 0 hom. )
Failed GnomAD Quality Control
Consequence
INSR
NM_000208.4 3_prime_UTR
NM_000208.4 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.0690
Genes affected
INSR (HGNC:6091): (insulin receptor) This gene encodes a member of the receptor tyrosine kinase family of proteins. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate alpha and beta subunits that form a heterotetrameric receptor. Binding of insulin or other ligands to this receptor activates the insulin signaling pathway, which regulates glucose uptake and release, as well as the synthesis and storage of carbohydrates, lipids and protein. Mutations in this gene underlie the inherited severe insulin resistance syndromes including type A insulin resistance syndrome, Donohue syndrome and Rabson-Mendenhall syndrome. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.81).
BP6
Variant 19-7113199-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-7113199-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 330359.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0124 (1881/151844) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0419 (1726/41198). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0402. There are 42 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 883 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 42 AD,AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INSR | NM_000208.4 | c.*3857C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 22/22 | ENST00000302850.10 | ||
INSR | NM_001079817.3 | c.*3857C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 21/21 | |||
INSR | XM_011527988.3 | c.*3857C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 22/22 | |||
INSR | XM_011527989.4 | c.*3857C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 21/21 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INSR | ENST00000302850.10 | c.*3857C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 22/22 | 1 | NM_000208.4 | A2 | ||
INSR | ENST00000341500.9 | c.*3857C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 21/21 | 1 | P3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0124 AC: 1877AN: 151726Hom.: 41 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1877
AN:
151726
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0 AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 8Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 4
GnomAD4 exome
Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
8
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
4
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0124 AC: 1881AN: 151844Hom.: 42 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0119 AC XY: 883AN XY: 74250
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1881
AN:
151844
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
883
AN XY:
74250
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Insulin-resistant diabetes mellitus AND acanthosis nigricans Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Rabson-Mendenhall syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Leprechaunism syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at