chr19-7142813-T-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 0P and 18B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_000208.4(INSR):c.2542+3A>G variant causes a splice donor region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00929 in 1,613,910 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 164 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.018 ( 50 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0083 ( 114 hom. )
Consequence
INSR
NM_000208.4 splice_donor_region, intron
NM_000208.4 splice_donor_region, intron
Scores
2
Splicing: ADA: 0.08482
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.07
Genes affected
INSR (HGNC:6091): (insulin receptor) This gene encodes a member of the receptor tyrosine kinase family of proteins. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate alpha and beta subunits that form a heterotetrameric receptor. Binding of insulin or other ligands to this receptor activates the insulin signaling pathway, which regulates glucose uptake and release, as well as the synthesis and storage of carbohydrates, lipids and protein. Mutations in this gene underlie the inherited severe insulin resistance syndromes including type A insulin resistance syndrome, Donohue syndrome and Rabson-Mendenhall syndrome. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.44).
BP6
Variant 19-7142813-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-7142813-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 330457.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr19-7142813-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0184 (2807/152298) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0437 (1817/41562). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.042. There are 50 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 1370 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 50 AD,AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INSR | NM_000208.4 | c.2542+3A>G | splice_donor_region_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000302850.10 | NP_000199.2 | |||
INSR | NM_001079817.3 | c.2506+3A>G | splice_donor_region_variant, intron_variant | NP_001073285.1 | ||||
INSR | XM_011527988.3 | c.2542+3A>G | splice_donor_region_variant, intron_variant | XP_011526290.2 | ||||
INSR | XM_011527989.4 | c.2506+3A>G | splice_donor_region_variant, intron_variant | XP_011526291.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INSR | ENST00000302850.10 | c.2542+3A>G | splice_donor_region_variant, intron_variant | 1 | NM_000208.4 | ENSP00000303830 | A2 | |||
INSR | ENST00000341500.9 | c.2506+3A>G | splice_donor_region_variant, intron_variant | 1 | ENSP00000342838 | P3 | ||||
INSR | ENST00000597211.1 | n.225+3A>G | splice_donor_region_variant, intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0183 AC: 2791AN: 152180Hom.: 49 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
2791
AN:
152180
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0113 AC: 2815AN: 249188Hom.: 42 AF XY: 0.0100 AC XY: 1355AN XY: 135094
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
2815
AN:
249188
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
1355
AN XY:
135094
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00834 AC: 12190AN: 1461612Hom.: 114 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00794 AC XY: 5772AN XY: 727112
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
12190
AN:
1461612
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
5772
AN XY:
727112
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0184 AC: 2807AN: 152298Hom.: 50 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0184 AC XY: 1370AN XY: 74484
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
2807
AN:
152298
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
1370
AN XY:
74484
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
79
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Insulin-resistant diabetes mellitus AND acanthosis nigricans Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Rabson-Mendenhall syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 31, 2023 | - - |
Leprechaunism syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at