chr2-10047996-C-T

Position:

chr2-10047996-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_003597.5(KLF11):c.659C>T(p.Thr220Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00241 in 1,614,082 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 91 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.012 ( 52 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0014 ( 39 hom. )

Consequence

KLF11
NM_003597.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts P:1B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.392

Variant links:

Genes affected

KLF11 (HGNC:11811): (KLF transcription factor 11) The protein encoded by this gene is a zinc finger transcription factor that binds to SP1-like sequences in epsilon- and gamma-globin gene promoters. This binding inhibits cell growth and causes apoptosis. Defects in this gene are a cause of maturity-onset diabetes of the young type 7 (MODY7). Three transcript variants encoding two different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2010]

KLF11 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.04048261).

BP6

Variant 2-10047996-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-10047996-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 6499.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr2-10047996-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0121 (1842/152306) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0417 (1734/41558). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0401. There are 52 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 868 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 1842 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE
KLF11	NM_003597.5 linkuse as main transcript	c.659C>T	p.Thr220Met	missense_variant	3/4	ENST00000305883.6
KLF11	NM_001177716.2 linkuse as main transcript	c.608C>T	p.Thr203Met	missense_variant	3/4
KLF11	NM_001177718.2 linkuse as main transcript	c.608C>T	p.Thr203Met	missense_variant	3/4
KLF11	XM_047446025.1 linkuse as main transcript	c.608C>T	p.Thr203Met	missense_variant	3/4

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
KLF11	ENST00000305883.6 linkuse as main transcript	c.659C>T	p.Thr220Met	missense_variant	3/4	1	NM_003597.5	A2	O14901-1
KLF11	ENST00000535335.1 linkuse as main transcript	c.608C>T	p.Thr203Met	missense_variant	3/4	2		P4	O14901-2
KLF11	ENST00000540845.5 linkuse as main transcript	c.608C>T	p.Thr203Met	missense_variant	3/4	2		P4	O14901-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0120

AC:

1830

AN:

152188

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0416

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00419

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000621

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00633

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00908

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00335

AC:

842

AN:

251388

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00241

AC XY:

328

AN XY:

135886

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0457

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00150

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000381

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000294

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000167

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00195

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00140

AC:

2046

AN:

1461776

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00115

AC XY:

836

AN XY:

727210

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0453

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00217

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.000453

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000580

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000132

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00330

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0121

AC:

1842

AN:

152306

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0117

AC XY:

868

AN XY:

74460

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0417

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00418

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000622

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000294

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00899

Alfa

AF:

0.00228

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0142

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.0458

AC:

202

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000233

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00421

AC:

511

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00433

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000164

EpiControl

AF:

0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Benign:8

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:4

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Jan 22, 2024	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	May 03, 2021	This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22995991, 24123366, 20981092, 15774581) -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	not provided	Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics	Oct 11, 2016	- -

Maturity-onset diabetes of the young type 7

Pathogenic:1Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories	Nov 22, 2023	- -
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided	literature only	OMIM	Mar 29, 2005	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Apr 28, 2017	This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

not specified

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

- -

Monogenic diabetes

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

research

Personalized Diabetes Medicine Program, University of Maryland School of Medicine

Jan 13, 2017

ACMG Criteria:BS2 (8 homozygotes in ExAC (african population)), BS1 (4% in African population in ESP), BP4 (6 predictors) and PP3 (3 predictors) -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.20

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.61

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.62

CADD

Benign

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.17

T;.;.

Eigen

Benign

-0.36

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.54

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.34

LIST_S2

Benign

0.79

T;T;.

MetaRNN

Benign

0.040

T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.1

M;.;.

MutationTaster

Benign

3.9e-11

A;A;A

PrimateAI

Benign

0.26

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.5

N;N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.13

Sift

Benign

0.031

D;D;D

Sift4G

Benign

0.11

T;T;T

Polyphen

0.99

D;.;.

Vest4

0.66

MVP

0.59

MPC

0.022

ClinPred

0.011

GERP RS

1.7

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.1

Varity_R

0.026

gMVP

0.32

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over