chr2-108765511-T-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 1P and 3B. PP2BP4_ModerateBS2_Supporting
The NM_006267.5(RANBP2):āc.4972T>Gā(p.Phe1658Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000096 in 1,562,054 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006267.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RANBP2 | NM_006267.5 | c.4972T>G | p.Phe1658Val | missense_variant | 20/29 | ENST00000283195.11 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RANBP2 | ENST00000283195.11 | c.4972T>G | p.Phe1658Val | missense_variant | 20/29 | 1 | NM_006267.5 | P1 | |
RANBP2 | ENST00000697737.1 | c.2603-6190T>G | intron_variant | ||||||
RANBP2 | ENST00000697740.1 | c.2525-6190T>G | intron_variant |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000994 AC: 1AN: 100588Hom.: 0 Cov.: 11
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000161 AC: 4AN: 248720Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000741 AC XY: 1AN XY: 134890
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000958 AC: 14AN: 1461466Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00000688 AC XY: 5AN XY: 727034
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000994 AC: 1AN: 100588Hom.: 0 Cov.: 11 AF XY: 0.0000207 AC XY: 1AN XY: 48352
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 11, 2023 | The c.4972T>G (p.F1658V) alteration is located in exon 20 (coding exon 20) of the RANBP2 gene. This alteration results from a T to G substitution at nucleotide position 4972, causing the phenylalanine (F) at amino acid position 1658 to be replaced by a valine (V). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Familial acute necrotizing encephalopathy Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Aug 31, 2021 | This sequence change replaces phenylalanine with valine at codon 1658 of the RANBP2 protein (p.Phe1658Val). The phenylalanine residue is highly conserved and there is a small physicochemical difference between phenylalanine and valine. This variant is present in population databases (rs755016899, ExAC 0.002%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with RANBP2-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 426479). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function are either unavailable or do not agree on the potential impact of this missense change (SIFT: "Deleterious"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Class C45"). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 14, 2017 | The F1658V variant has not been published as a pathogenic variant, nor has it been reported as a benign variant to our knowledge. The F1658V variant is not observed at a significant frequency in large population cohorts (Lek et al., 2016; 1000 Genomes Consortium et al., 2015; Exome Variant Server). The F1658V variant is a semi-conservative amino acid substitution, which may impact secondary protein structure as these residues differ in some properties. This substitution occurs at a position that is not conserved. In silico analysis is inconsistent in its predictions as to whether or not the variant is damaging to the protein structure/function. In summary, based on the currently available information, it is unclear whether this variant is a pathogenic variant or a rare benign variant. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at