chr2-120989830-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001374353.1(GLI2):c.3865G>A(p.Asp1289Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.693 in 1,611,070 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 391,822 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001374353.1 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLI2 | NM_001374353.1 | c.3865G>A | p.Asp1289Asn | missense_variant | 14/14 | ENST00000361492.9 | NP_001361282.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLI2 | ENST00000361492.9 | c.3865G>A | p.Asp1289Asn | missense_variant | 14/14 | 1 | NM_001374353.1 | ENSP00000354586.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.659 AC: 100139AN: 152032Hom.: 33512 Cov.: 35
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.645 AC: 159215AN: 246908Hom.: 52450 AF XY: 0.646 AC XY: 86616AN XY: 134112
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.697 AC: 1016406AN: 1458920Hom.: 358295 Cov.: 57 AF XY: 0.692 AC XY: 502381AN XY: 725534
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.658 AC: 100174AN: 152150Hom.: 33527 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.652 AC XY: 48522AN XY: 74378
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | May 09, 2013 | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 29, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 28, 2018 | - - |
Holoprosencephaly 9 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Aug 10, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Holoprosencephaly 9;C4014479:Postaxial polydactyly-anterior pituitary anomalies-facial dysmorphism syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Postaxial polydactyly-anterior pituitary anomalies-facial dysmorphism syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Aug 10, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at