chr2-151643821-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BP7
The NM_001164507.2(NEB):c.7953C>T(p.Ser2651=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000819 in 1,612,232 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000085 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000082 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
NEB
NM_001164507.2 synonymous
NM_001164507.2 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.0530
Genes affected
NEB (HGNC:7720): (nebulin) This gene encodes nebulin, a giant protein component of the cytoskeletal matrix that coexists with the thick and thin filaments within the sarcomeres of skeletal muscle. In most vertebrates, nebulin accounts for 3 to 4% of the total myofibrillar protein. The encoded protein contains approximately 30-amino acid long modules that can be classified into 7 types and other repeated modules. Protein isoform sizes vary from 600 to 800 kD due to alternative splicing that is tissue-, species-,and developmental stage-specific. Of the 183 exons in the nebulin gene, at least 43 are alternatively spliced, although exons 143 and 144 are not found in the same transcript. Of the several thousand transcript variants predicted for nebulin, the RefSeq Project has decided to create three representative RefSeq records. Mutations in this gene are associated with recessive nemaline myopathy. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.67).
BP6
Variant 2-151643821-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-151643821-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 510776.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.053 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEB | NM_001164507.2 | c.7953C>T | p.Ser2651= | synonymous_variant | 57/182 | ENST00000427231.7 | NP_001157979.2 | |
NEB | NM_001164508.2 | c.7953C>T | p.Ser2651= | synonymous_variant | 57/182 | ENST00000397345.8 | NP_001157980.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEB | ENST00000397345.8 | c.7953C>T | p.Ser2651= | synonymous_variant | 57/182 | 5 | NM_001164508.2 | ENSP00000380505 | P5 | |
NEB | ENST00000427231.7 | c.7953C>T | p.Ser2651= | synonymous_variant | 57/182 | 5 | NM_001164507.2 | ENSP00000416578 | A2 | |
NEB | ENST00000409198.5 | c.7953C>T | p.Ser2651= | synonymous_variant | 57/150 | 5 | ENSP00000386259 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000789 AC: 12AN: 152166Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
12
AN:
152166
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000137 AC: 34AN: 248424Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000816 AC XY: 11AN XY: 134736
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
34
AN:
248424
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
11
AN XY:
134736
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000815 AC: 119AN: 1459948Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000634 AC XY: 46AN XY: 725876
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
119
AN:
1459948
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
46
AN XY:
725876
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000854 AC: 13AN: 152284Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000121 AC XY: 9AN XY: 74476
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
13
AN:
152284
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
9
AN XY:
74476
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Nemaline myopathy 2 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 24, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 18, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at