chr2-151643821-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BP7

The NM_001164507.2(NEB):​c.7953C>T​(p.Ser2651=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000819 in 1,612,232 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000085 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000082 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

NEB
NM_001164507.2 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0530
Variant links:
Genes affected
NEB (HGNC:7720): (nebulin) This gene encodes nebulin, a giant protein component of the cytoskeletal matrix that coexists with the thick and thin filaments within the sarcomeres of skeletal muscle. In most vertebrates, nebulin accounts for 3 to 4% of the total myofibrillar protein. The encoded protein contains approximately 30-amino acid long modules that can be classified into 7 types and other repeated modules. Protein isoform sizes vary from 600 to 800 kD due to alternative splicing that is tissue-, species-,and developmental stage-specific. Of the 183 exons in the nebulin gene, at least 43 are alternatively spliced, although exons 143 and 144 are not found in the same transcript. Of the several thousand transcript variants predicted for nebulin, the RefSeq Project has decided to create three representative RefSeq records. Mutations in this gene are associated with recessive nemaline myopathy. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.67).
BP6
Variant 2-151643821-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-151643821-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 510776.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.053 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
NEBNM_001164507.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.7953C>T p.Ser2651= synonymous_variant 57/182 ENST00000427231.7 NP_001157979.2
NEBNM_001164508.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.7953C>T p.Ser2651= synonymous_variant 57/182 ENST00000397345.8 NP_001157980.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
NEBENST00000397345.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.7953C>T p.Ser2651= synonymous_variant 57/1825 NM_001164508.2 ENSP00000380505 P5P20929-2
NEBENST00000427231.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.7953C>T p.Ser2651= synonymous_variant 57/1825 NM_001164507.2 ENSP00000416578 A2P20929-3
NEBENST00000409198.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.7953C>T p.Ser2651= synonymous_variant 57/1505 ENSP00000386259 P20929-4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000789
AC:
12
AN:
152166
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000483
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00173
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000137
AC:
34
AN:
248424
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000816
AC XY:
11
AN XY:
134736
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00178
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000889
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000815
AC:
119
AN:
1459948
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000634
AC XY:
46
AN XY:
725876
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000269
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00199
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000232
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000135
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000232
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000854
AC:
13
AN:
152284
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000121
AC XY:
9
AN XY:
74476
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000963
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00154
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000434
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000132
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Nemaline myopathy 2 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 24, 2024- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJul 18, 2017This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.67
CADD
Benign
0.12
DANN
Benign
0.61

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs183764569; hg19: chr2-152500335; API