chr2-165295847-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2
The NM_001040142.2(SCN2A):c.24G>A(p.Pro8=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000278 in 1,614,052 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P8P) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001040142.2 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCN2A | NM_001040142.2 | c.24G>A | p.Pro8= | synonymous_variant | 2/27 | ENST00000375437.7 | |
SCN2A | NM_001371246.1 | c.24G>A | p.Pro8= | synonymous_variant | 2/27 | ENST00000631182.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCN2A | ENST00000375437.7 | c.24G>A | p.Pro8= | synonymous_variant | 2/27 | 5 | NM_001040142.2 | P1 | |
SCN2A | ENST00000631182.3 | c.24G>A | p.Pro8= | synonymous_variant | 2/27 | 5 | NM_001371246.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000243 AC: 37AN: 152108Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000387 AC: 97AN: 250398Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000370 AC XY: 50AN XY: 135308
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000281 AC: 411AN: 1461826Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000289 AC XY: 210AN XY: 727214
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000243 AC: 37AN: 152226Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000215 AC XY: 16AN XY: 74426
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 27, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jun 24, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Dec 07, 2017 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Apr 26, 2016 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Seizures, benign familial infantile, 3;C3150987:Developmental and epileptic encephalopathy, 11 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Dec 22, 2023 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jan 01, 2023 | SCN2A: BP4, BP7 - |
Seizures, benign familial infantile, 3 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at