chr2-165915374-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_024753.5(TTC21B):​c.1965G>A​(p.Arg655Arg) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00141 in 1,613,976 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 34 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0075 ( 16 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00078 ( 18 hom. )

Consequence

TTC21B
NM_024753.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.287

Publications

4 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TTC21B (HGNC:25660): (tetratricopeptide repeat domain 21B) This gene encodes a member of TTC21 family, containing several tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) domains. This protein is localized to the cilium axoneme, and may play a role in retrograde intraflagellar transport in cilia. Mutations in this gene are associated with various ciliopathies, nephronophthisis 12, and asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy 4. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2011]
TTC21B Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • nephronophthisis 12
    Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy 4
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • Jeune syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • nephronophthisis 2
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.71).
BP6
Variant 2-165915374-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-165915374-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 379762.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.287 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00749 (1140/152154) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0261 (1082/41510). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0248. There are 16 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 546 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 16 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TTC21BNM_024753.5 linkc.1965G>A p.Arg655Arg synonymous_variant Exon 15 of 29 ENST00000243344.8 NP_079029.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TTC21BENST00000243344.8 linkc.1965G>A p.Arg655Arg synonymous_variant Exon 15 of 29 1 NM_024753.5 ENSP00000243344.7 Q7Z4L5-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00750
AC:
1141
AN:
152036
Hom.:
16
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0262
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00269
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000415
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00718
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00195
AC:
491
AN:
251312
AF XY:
0.00154
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0273
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00110
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000489
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000782
AC:
1143
AN:
1461822
Hom.:
18
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000668
AC XY:
486
AN XY:
727212
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0287
AC:
962
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00107
AC:
48
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26132
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39686
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000174
AC:
15
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53418
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000347
AC:
2
AN:
5764
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000234
AC:
26
AN:
1111968
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00149
AC:
90
AN:
60394
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.477
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
61
122
183
244
305
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
36
72
108
144
180
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00749
AC:
1140
AN:
152154
Hom.:
16
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00734
AC XY:
546
AN XY:
74380
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0261
AC:
1082
AN:
41510
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00268
AC:
41
AN:
15282
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5170
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000416
AC:
2
AN:
4812
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10590
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
68006
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00711
AC:
15
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.505
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
62
123
185
246
308
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00343
Hom.:
7
Bravo
AF:
0.00835
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00202
AC:
7
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:2
Nov 22, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

not specified Benign:1
May 10, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Jeune thoracic dystrophy;C0687120:Nephronophthisis Benign:1
Jan 29, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy 4 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Nephronophthisis 12 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Connective tissue disorder Benign:1
Jun 18, 2021
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.71
CADD
Benign
3.5
DANN
Benign
0.50
PhyloP100
-0.29
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs16822802; hg19: chr2-166771884; API