chr2-165915374-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_024753.5(TTC21B):c.1965G>A(p.Arg655Arg) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00141 in 1,613,976 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 34 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0075 ( 16 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00078 ( 18 hom. )
Consequence
TTC21B
NM_024753.5 synonymous
NM_024753.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.287
Genes affected
TTC21B (HGNC:25660): (tetratricopeptide repeat domain 21B) This gene encodes a member of TTC21 family, containing several tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) domains. This protein is localized to the cilium axoneme, and may play a role in retrograde intraflagellar transport in cilia. Mutations in this gene are associated with various ciliopathies, nephronophthisis 12, and asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy 4. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2011]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.71).
BP6
Variant 2-165915374-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-165915374-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 379762.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.287 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00749 (1140/152154) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0261 (1082/41510). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0248. There are 16 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 546 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 16 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTC21B | NM_024753.5 | c.1965G>A | p.Arg655Arg | synonymous_variant | 15/29 | ENST00000243344.8 | NP_079029.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTC21B | ENST00000243344.8 | c.1965G>A | p.Arg655Arg | synonymous_variant | 15/29 | 1 | NM_024753.5 | ENSP00000243344.7 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00750 AC: 1141AN: 152036Hom.: 16 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1141
AN:
152036
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00195 AC: 491AN: 251312Hom.: 7 AF XY: 0.00154 AC XY: 209AN XY: 135816
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
491
AN:
251312
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
209
AN XY:
135816
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000782 AC: 1143AN: 1461822Hom.: 18 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000668 AC XY: 486AN XY: 727212
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1143
AN:
1461822
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
486
AN XY:
727212
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00749 AC: 1140AN: 152154Hom.: 16 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00734 AC XY: 546AN XY: 74380
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1140
AN:
152154
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
546
AN XY:
74380
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
7
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 22, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 10, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy 4 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Jeune thoracic dystrophy;C0687120:Nephronophthisis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Nephronophthisis 12 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Connective tissue disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children | Jun 18, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at