chr2-166272421-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong
The NM_001365536.1(SCN9A):c.3329C>T(p.Ser1110Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000142 in 1,598,036 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. S1110P) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001365536.1 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001365536.1. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCN9A | MANE Select | c.3329C>T | p.Ser1110Leu | missense | Exon 17 of 27 | ENSP00000495601.1 | Q15858-1 | ||
| SCN9A | TSL:5 | c.3329C>T | p.Ser1110Leu | missense | Exon 17 of 27 | ENSP00000304748.7 | Q15858-1 | ||
| SCN9A | TSL:5 | c.3296C>T | p.Ser1099Leu | missense | Exon 17 of 27 | ENSP00000386306.1 | Q15858-3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000612 AC: 93AN: 151960Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000194 AC: 46AN: 236918 AF XY: 0.000187 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000920 AC: 133AN: 1445958Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000934 AC XY: 67AN XY: 717158 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000618 AC: 94AN: 152078Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000619 AC XY: 46AN XY: 74312 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at