chr2-166278220-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001365536.1(SCN9A):​c.2437A>G​(p.Ser813Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00126 in 1,612,946 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 40 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another nucleotide change resulting in the same amino acid substitution has been previously reported as Uncertain significance in ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. S813N) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00077 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0013 ( 39 hom. )

Consequence

SCN9A
NM_001365536.1 missense

Scores

6
12

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.17

Publications

5 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
SCN9A (HGNC:10597): (sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 9) This gene encodes a voltage-gated sodium channel which plays a significant role in nociception signaling. Mutations in this gene have been associated with primary erythermalgia, channelopathy-associated insensitivity to pain, and paroxysmal extreme pain disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2009]
SCN1A-AS1 (HGNC:54069): (SCN1A and SCN9A antisense RNA 1)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.011776537).
BP6
Variant 2-166278220-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-166278220-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 331982.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000775 (118/152288) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.0238 (115/4824). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0203. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 86 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 39 AD,SD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SCN9ANM_001365536.1 linkc.2437A>G p.Ser813Gly missense_variant Exon 15 of 27 ENST00000642356.2 NP_001352465.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SCN9AENST00000642356.2 linkc.2437A>G p.Ser813Gly missense_variant Exon 15 of 27 NM_001365536.1 ENSP00000495601.1 Q15858-1
SCN9AENST00000303354.11 linkc.2437A>G p.Ser813Gly missense_variant Exon 15 of 27 5 ENSP00000304748.7 Q15858-1
SCN9AENST00000409672.5 linkc.2404A>G p.Ser802Gly missense_variant Exon 15 of 27 5 ENSP00000386306.1 Q15858-3
SCN9AENST00000645907.1 linkc.2404A>G p.Ser802Gly missense_variant Exon 15 of 27 ENSP00000495983.1 Q15858-4
SCN9AENST00000454569.6 linkc.2404A>G p.Ser802Gly missense_variant Exon 15 of 15 1 ENSP00000413212.2 A0A0C4DG82

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000782
AC:
119
AN:
152170
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000656
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0240
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00268
AC:
661
AN:
247084
AF XY:
0.00353
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000884
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000267
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000670
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00131
AC:
1911
AN:
1460658
Hom.:
39
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.00188
AC XY:
1368
AN XY:
726644
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
33436
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000672
AC:
3
AN:
44662
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26118
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39582
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0210
AC:
1808
AN:
86182
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000564
AC:
3
AN:
53178
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000521
AC:
3
AN:
5760
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000207
AC:
23
AN:
1111400
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00118
AC:
71
AN:
60340
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
98
197
295
394
492
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
30
60
90
120
150
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000775
AC:
118
AN:
152288
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00116
AC XY:
86
AN XY:
74456
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000241
AC:
1
AN:
41572
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000655
AC:
1
AN:
15270
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5186
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0238
AC:
115
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10624
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
68022
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000473
AC:
1
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.499
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
6
13
19
26
32
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000233
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000147
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000259
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.00289
AC:
349
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00549
AC:
19
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Mar 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

SCN9A: BS1, BS2 -

Aug 26, 2021
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 29176367) -

Sep 20, 2016
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:1
Mar 14, 2025
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Inherited Erythromelalgia Benign:1
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Primary erythromelalgia Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Channelopathy-associated congenital insensitivity to pain, autosomal recessive Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus, type 7;C2752089:Neuropathy, hereditary sensory and autonomic, type 2A Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Paroxysmal extreme pain disorder Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.11
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.25
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.11
CADD
Benign
20
DANN
Uncertain
0.98
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.43
.;T;.;.;T;.;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.30
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.087
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.85
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.78
T;.;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.012
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.40
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.53
.;N;.;.;N;N;.;.
PhyloP100
2.2
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.59
T
PROVEAN
Benign
2.3
N;.;.;.;.;N;.;.
REVEL
Uncertain
0.40
Sift
Benign
1.0
T;.;.;.;.;T;.;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.63
T;T;.;.;.;T;.;.
Vest4
0.39
MVP
0.74
MPC
0.11
ClinPred
0.035
T
GERP RS
5.2
PromoterAI
0.024
Neutral
Varity_R
0.31
gMVP
0.78
Mutation Taster
=2/98
disease causing

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201890240; hg19: chr2-167134730; API