chr2-178529113-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):​c.106638G>A​(p.Arg35546Arg) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00216 in 1,594,198 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 52 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0018 ( 5 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0022 ( 47 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:26

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.823
Variant links:
Genes affected
TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]
TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.48).
BP6
Variant 2-178529113-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178529113-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 47711.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr2-178529113-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr2-178529113-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.823 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00176 (268/152228) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.024 (116/4826). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0205. There are 5 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 151 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 5 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TTNNM_001267550.2 linkc.106638G>A p.Arg35546Arg synonymous_variant Exon 360 of 363 ENST00000589042.5 NP_001254479.2 A0A0A0MTS7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TTNENST00000589042.5 linkc.106638G>A p.Arg35546Arg synonymous_variant Exon 360 of 363 5 NM_001267550.2 ENSP00000467141.1 A0A0A0MTS7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00174
AC:
265
AN:
152110
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000169
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00170
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000866
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0234
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00166
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00144
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00381
AC:
901
AN:
236276
Hom.:
13
AF XY:
0.00486
AC XY:
623
AN XY:
128222
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000132
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000857
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000971
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0234
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00177
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00376
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00221
AC:
3182
AN:
1441970
Hom.:
47
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00283
AC XY:
2027
AN XY:
715628
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000342
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000761
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000868
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000507
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0217
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000760
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00102
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00276
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00176
AC:
268
AN:
152228
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00203
AC XY:
151
AN XY:
74428
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000169
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00170
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000866
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0240
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00166
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00142
Alfa
AF:
0.00105
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00104
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00953
AC:
33
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:26
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:8
Apr 28, 2015
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

p.Arg32978Arg in exon 309 of TTN: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it has been identified in 2.5% (384/15216) of South Asian c hromosomes, including 8 homozygotes, by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs56324602). -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 04, 2019
Athena Diagnostics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 29, 2014
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 06, 2020
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 03, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:6
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 14, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 01, 2023
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

TTN: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Feb 02, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
May 28, 2019
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Feb 22, 2017
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.48
CADD
Benign
0.045
DANN
Benign
0.51

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs56324602; hg19: chr2-179393840; API