chr2-178533814-CTTA-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points: 2P and 0B. PM4_SupportingPP5
The NM_001267550.2(TTN):c.102798_102800delTAA(p.Asn34266del) variant causes a disruptive inframe deletion change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000109 in 1,461,662 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001267550.2 disruptive_inframe_deletion
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTN | NM_001267550.2 | c.102798_102800delTAA | p.Asn34266del | disruptive_inframe_deletion | Exon 358 of 363 | ENST00000589042.5 | NP_001254479.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTN | ENST00000589042.5 | c.102798_102800delTAA | p.Asn34266del | disruptive_inframe_deletion | Exon 358 of 363 | 5 | NM_001267550.2 | ENSP00000467141.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000803 AC: 2AN: 249134Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000148 AC XY: 2AN XY: 135142
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000109 AC: 16AN: 1461662Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000963 AC XY: 7AN XY: 727114
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2
Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In-frame single amino acid deletion in a gene in which most reported pathogenic variants are truncating/loss of function; Located in the M-line region of TTN in which the majority of loss of function variants have been associated with autosomal recessive titinopathies (Carmignac et al., 2007); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 35081925) -
- -
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Pathogenic:1
This variant, c.102798_102800del, results in the deletion of 1 amino acid(s) of the TTN protein (p.Asn34266del), but otherwise preserves the integrity of the reading frame. This variant is present in population databases (no rsID available, gnomAD 0.002%). This variant has been observed in individual(s) with autosomal recessive TTN-related conditions (PMID: 35081925; internal data). In at least one individual the data is consistent with being in trans (on the opposite chromosome) from a pathogenic variant. This variant has been reported in individual(s) with autosomal dominant dilated cardiomyopathy (internal data); however, the role of the variant in this condition is currently unclear. This variant is located in the M band of TTN (PMID: 25589632). Non-truncating variants in this region may be relevant for neuromuscular disorders, but have not been definitively shown to cause cardiomyopathy (PMID: 23975875). In summary, the currently available evidence indicates that the variant is pathogenic, but additional data are needed to prove that conclusively. Therefore, this variant has been classified as Likely Pathogenic. -
Multiminicore myopathy Pathogenic:1
- -
Cardiomyopathy Uncertain:1
- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Uncertain:1
The c.75603_75605delTAA variant (also known as p.N25201del) is located in coding exon 185 of the TTN gene. This variant results from an in-frame TAA deletion at nucleotide positions 75603 to 75605. This results in the in-frame deletion of an asparagine at codon 25201. This alteration has been reported in a congenital myopathy cohort (Zhang Y et al. BMC Pediatr, 2022 Jan;22:65). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis (Choi Y et al. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7(10):e46688). Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at