chr2-178549264-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 1P and 5B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6
The NM_001267550.2(TTN):c.92362G>A(p.Gly30788Ser) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000367 in 1,613,794 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G30788D) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001267550.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTN | NM_001267550.2 | c.92362G>A | p.Gly30788Ser | missense_variant | 339/363 | ENST00000589042.5 | |
TTN-AS1 | NR_038272.1 | n.2043+6903C>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTN | ENST00000589042.5 | c.92362G>A | p.Gly30788Ser | missense_variant | 339/363 | 5 | NM_001267550.2 | P1 | |
ENST00000603415.1 | n.381C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 1/1 | ||||||
TTN-AS1 | ENST00000659121.1 | n.416+25628C>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000499 AC: 76AN: 152178Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000662 AC: 165AN: 249116Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000622 AC XY: 84AN XY: 135138
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000353 AC: 516AN: 1461616Hom.: 1 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.000334 AC XY: 243AN XY: 727092
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000499 AC: 76AN: 152178Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000753 AC XY: 56AN XY: 74334
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 18, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 12, 2020 | - - |
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | May 20, 2015 | p.Gly28220Ser in exon 288 of TTN: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it has been identified in 0.4% (28/6610) of Finnish chromos omes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs199891245). - |
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 26, 2023 | - - |
Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at