chr2-178563572-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):​c.82560C>A​(p.Asn27520Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00211 in 1,613,796 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 47 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0017 ( 5 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0022 ( 42 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 missense

Scores

2
8
6

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:22

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.30
Variant links:
Genes affected
TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]
TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0070592165).
BP6
Variant 2-178563572-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178563572-G-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 47414.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Benign=12, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr2-178563572-G-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr2-178563572-G-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00174 (265/152256) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0232 (112/4826). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0197. There are 5 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 149 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 5 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TTNNM_001267550.2 linkc.82560C>A p.Asn27520Lys missense_variant Exon 326 of 363 ENST00000589042.5 NP_001254479.2 A0A0A0MTS7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TTNENST00000589042.5 linkc.82560C>A p.Asn27520Lys missense_variant Exon 326 of 363 5 NM_001267550.2 ENSP00000467141.1 A0A0A0MTS7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00172
AC:
262
AN:
152138
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000169
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00170
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000865
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0226
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00168
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00143
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00361
AC:
898
AN:
248844
Hom.:
12
AF XY:
0.00457
AC XY:
617
AN XY:
135056
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000129
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000840
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000895
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0210
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00173
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00347
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00215
AC:
3146
AN:
1461540
Hom.:
42
Cov.:
37
AF XY:
0.00275
AC XY:
1996
AN XY:
727058
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000329
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000738
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000842
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000504
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0202
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000749
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00103
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00268
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00174
AC:
265
AN:
152256
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00200
AC XY:
149
AN XY:
74432
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000168
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00170
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000865
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0232
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00168
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00142
Alfa
AF:
0.00154
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00104
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000270
AC:
1
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00156
AC:
6
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000501
AC:
2
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00180
AC:
15
ExAC
AF:
0.00414
AC:
501
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00953
AC:
33
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
0.00278
EpiControl
AF:
0.00243

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:22
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:6
-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

TTN: BS1, BS2 -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 14, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 17, 2014
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 24, 2013
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: research

- -

not specified Benign:7
-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 06, 2020
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 25, 2015
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

p.Asn24952Lys in exon 275 of TTN: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it has been identified in 2.3% (372/16512) of South Asian c hromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute .org; dbSNP rs56264840). -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 01, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 05, 2019
Athena Diagnostics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 08, 2016
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Feb 02, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
May 30, 2019
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Primary dilated cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Feb 28, 2017
Center for Advanced Laboratory Medicine, UC San Diego Health, University of California San Diego
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Feb 22, 2017
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.86
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.44
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.38
CADD
Benign
16
DANN
Benign
0.92
Eigen
Uncertain
0.45
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.38
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.94
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.93
D;D;D;.;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0071
T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.47
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.5
.;.;.;M;.;.;M
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.66
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-4.6
D;D;.;.;D;D;.
REVEL
Uncertain
0.42
Sift
Uncertain
0.0030
D;D;.;.;D;D;.
Polyphen
1.0
.;.;.;D;.;.;D
Vest4
0.38
MutPred
0.58
.;.;.;Gain of catalytic residue at N25879 (P = 0.0091);.;.;Gain of catalytic residue at N25879 (P = 0.0091);
MVP
0.25
MPC
0.50
ClinPred
0.13
T
GERP RS
2.8

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs56264840; hg19: chr2-179428299; API