chr2-178616627-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4_Moderate
The NM_001267550.2(TTN):c.48164G>A(p.Arg16055His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000107 in 1,610,764 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001267550.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTN | NM_001267550.2  | c.48164G>A | p.Arg16055His | missense_variant | Exon 257 of 363 | ENST00000589042.5 | NP_001254479.2 | 
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTN | ENST00000589042.5  | c.48164G>A | p.Arg16055His | missense_variant | Exon 257 of 363 | 5 | NM_001267550.2 | ENSP00000467141.1 | 
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes   AF:  0.0000330  AC: 5AN: 151628Hom.:  0  Cov.: 32 show subpopulations 
GnomAD2 exomes  AF:  0.000122  AC: 30AN: 246810 AF XY:  0.000112   show subpopulations 
GnomAD4 exome  AF:  0.000115  AC: 168AN: 1459136Hom.:  0  Cov.: 32 AF XY:  0.000128  AC XY: 93AN XY: 725804 show subpopulations 
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome   AF:  0.0000330  AC: 5AN: 151628Hom.:  0  Cov.: 32 AF XY:  0.0000405  AC XY: 3AN XY: 74002 show subpopulations 
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided    Uncertain:1Benign:1 
This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 31983221) -
- -
not specified    Uncertain:1 
The TTN c.48164G>A; p.Arg16055His variant (rs72677238; ClinVar Variation ID: 202663) is rare in the general population (<1% allele frequency in the Genome Aggregation Database) and has not been reported in the medical literature in association with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) or other TTN-related disease. The clinical relevance of rare missense variants in this gene, which are identified on average once per individual sequenced in affected populations (Herman 2012), is not well understood. Yet, evidence suggests that the vast majority of such missense variants do not contribute to the clinical outcome of DCM (Begay 2015). Thus, the clinical significance of the p.Arg16055His variant cannot be determined with certainty. References: Begay RL et al. Role of Titin Missense Variants in Dilated Cardiomyopathy. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Nov 13;4(11). Herman DS et al. Truncations of titin causing dilated cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 16;366(7):619-28. Linke and Hamdani. Gigantic business: titin properties and function through thick and thin. Circ Res 2014; 114(6): 1052-1068. -
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G    Uncertain:1 
- -
Cardiovascular phenotype    Uncertain:1 
The p.R6990H variant (also known as c.20969G>A), located in coding exon 84 of the TTN gene, results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 20969. The arginine at codon 6990 is replaced by histidine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This variant was previously reported in the SNPDatabase as rs72677238. Based on data from the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (ESP), the A allele has an overall frequency of approximately 0.02% (2/11988) total alleles studied and 0.02% (2/8230) European American alleles. This amino acid position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this variant remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source: 
Splicing
 Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at