chr2-178779048-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):​c.4034G>A​(p.Gly1345Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00829 in 1,613,984 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 206 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.010 ( 39 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0081 ( 167 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 missense

Scores

6
5
5

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:21

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.87
Variant links:
Genes affected
TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]
TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0038927495).
BP6
Variant 2-178779048-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178779048-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 47018.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Benign=13, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr2-178779048-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr2-178779048-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0102 (1551/152294) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00894 (608/68028). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00835. There are 39 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 914 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 39 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TTNNM_001267550.2 linkc.4034G>A p.Gly1345Asp missense_variant Exon 24 of 363 ENST00000589042.5 NP_001254479.2 A0A0A0MTS7
TTNNM_133379.5 linkc.4034G>A p.Gly1345Asp missense_variant Exon 24 of 46 ENST00000360870.10 NP_596870.2 Q8WZ42-6Q7Z3B7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TTNENST00000589042.5 linkc.4034G>A p.Gly1345Asp missense_variant Exon 24 of 363 5 NM_001267550.2 ENSP00000467141.1 A0A0A0MTS7
TTNENST00000360870.10 linkc.4034G>A p.Gly1345Asp missense_variant Exon 24 of 46 5 NM_133379.5 ENSP00000354117.4 Q8WZ42-6

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0102
AC:
1551
AN:
152176
Hom.:
39
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00121
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00438
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000621
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0759
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00894
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00860
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0106
AC:
2655
AN:
250424
Hom.:
64
AF XY:
0.0105
AC XY:
1426
AN XY:
135318
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00123
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00165
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000796
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000719
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0705
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00849
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0107
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00809
AC:
11826
AN:
1461690
Hom.:
167
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.00778
AC XY:
5658
AN XY:
727150
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000896
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00148
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000842
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000580
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0658
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00688
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00815
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0102
AC:
1551
AN:
152294
Hom.:
39
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0123
AC XY:
914
AN XY:
74454
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00120
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00438
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000622
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0759
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00894
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00851
Alfa
AF:
0.00698
Hom.:
8
Bravo
AF:
0.00418
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00701
AC:
26
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00752
AC:
29
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000681
AC:
3
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00733
AC:
63
ExAC
AF:
0.00993
AC:
1206
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00144
AC:
5
AN:
3476

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:21
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:9
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 24, 2013
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: research

- -

May 18, 2015
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

p.Gly1345Asp in exon 24 of TTN: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 7.6% (503/6570) of Finnish chromoso mes including 27 homozygous individuals by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExA C, http://exac.broadinstitute.org/; dbSNP rs36021856). -

Dec 08, 2023
Athena Diagnostics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 23, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 30, 2019
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: TTN c.4034G>A (p.Gly1345Asp) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the near Z-band region of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.011 in 250424 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 64 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 17- fold the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in TTN causing Cardiomyopathy phenotype (0.011 vs.0.00063), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. c.4034G>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Cardiomyopathy without strong evidence for causality (e.g. Pugh_2014, Haas_2015, Campuzano_2015). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Cardiomyopathy. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Four clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories cited the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Nov 01, 2013
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:5
-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 14, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

TTN: BS2 -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Uncertain:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Oct 22, 2015
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
May 14, 2013
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.95
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.15
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.030
CADD
Uncertain
24
DANN
Benign
0.96
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.90
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.88
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.98
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.96
D;D;D;.;D;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0039
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.12
T
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.73
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-4.6
D;D;.;.;D;D;.;D
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.68
Sift
Benign
0.27
T;T;.;.;T;T;.;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0080
.;.;.;.;.;.;.;D
Polyphen
1.0
.;.;.;D;.;.;D;D
Vest4
0.35
MPC
0.53
ClinPred
0.038
T
GERP RS
5.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs36021856; hg19: chr2-179643775; API