chr2-189009052-G-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000090.4(COL3A1):c.3654G>T(p.Pro1218Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000829 in 1,614,146 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P1218P) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0044 ( 4 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00045 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

COL3A1
NM_000090.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.92

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

COL3A1 (HGNC:2201): (collagen type III alpha 1 chain) This gene encodes the pro-alpha1 chains of type III collagen, a fibrillar collagen that is found in extensible connective tissues such as skin, lung, uterus, intestine and the vascular system, frequently in association with type I collagen. Mutations in this gene are associated with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV, and with aortic and arterial aneurysms. [provided by R. Dalgleish, Feb 2008]

COL3A1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

autosomal dominant Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, vascular type
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Genomics England PanelApp
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, vascular type
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
polymicrogyria with or without vascular-type Ehlers-Danlos syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

COL3A1 links:

ENSG00000295704 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000295704 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.63).

BP6

Variant 2-189009052-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-189009052-G-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 199706.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.92 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00445 (677/152256) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0152 (633/41536). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0143. There are 4 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 310 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 4 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
COL3A1	NM_000090.4 link	c.3654G>T	p.Pro1218Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 48 of 51	ENST00000304636.9	NP_000081.2	P02461-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
COL3A1	ENST00000304636.9 link	c.3654G>T	p.Pro1218Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 48 of 51	1	NM_000090.4	ENSP00000304408.4		P02461-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00446

AC:

678

AN:

152138

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0153

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00236

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00335

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00109

AC:

273

AN:

251382

AF XY:

0.000640

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0152

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000636

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000489

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000452

AC:

661

AN:

1461890

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000400

AC XY:

291

AN XY:

727246

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0162

AC:

542

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000894

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000348

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53420

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000693

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000540

AC:

AN:

1112008

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00109

AC:

AN:

60396

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.473

Heterozygous variant carriers

120

160

200

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00445

AC:

677

AN:

152256

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00416

AC XY:

310

AN XY:

74450

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0152

AC:

633

AN:

41536

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00235

AC:

AN:

15304

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5172

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000207

AC:

AN:

4828

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10606

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68018

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00331

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.495

Heterozygous variant carriers

103

138

172

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00159

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00561

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000866

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:12

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:4

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 20, 2014

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Oct 16, 2018

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: COL3A1 c.3654G>T alters a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0014 in 277504 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database and publications, including 6 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 1100-fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in COL3A1 causing Aortopathy phenotype (1.3e-06), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.3654G>T in individuals affected with Aortopathy and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. One clinical diagnostic laboratory has submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation and classified the variant as benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Jul 22, 2019

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection

Benign:3

Jun 03, 2014

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Mar 08, 2018

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 24, 2016

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, type 4

Benign:3

Feb 05, 2024

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jan 29, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome

Benign:1

Jun 01, 2020

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:1

Nov 28, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.63

CADD

Benign

0.77

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.48

PhyloP100

-1.9

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over