chr2-189042757-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4BP6BS1BS2
The NM_000393.5(COL5A2):c.3488A>G(p.Gln1163Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000131 in 1,454,516 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000393.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Ehlers-Danlos syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
- Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic typeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
- Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, 2Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000393.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL5A2 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.3488A>G | p.Gln1163Arg | missense | Exon 49 of 54 | ENSP00000364000.3 | P05997 | ||
| COL5A2 | c.3485A>G | p.Gln1162Arg | missense | Exon 49 of 54 | ENSP00000528787.1 | ||||
| COL5A2 | c.3380A>G | p.Gln1127Arg | missense | Exon 48 of 53 | ENSP00000528788.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000666 AC: 16AN: 240154 AF XY: 0.0000540 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 19AN: 1454516Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000124 AC XY: 9AN XY: 722906 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at