chr2-189051464-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000393.5(COL5A2):c.2787G>A(p.Ala929Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000114 in 1,609,070 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00063 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000060 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

COL5A2
NM_000393.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.31

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

COL5A2 (HGNC:2210): (collagen type V alpha 2 chain) This gene encodes an alpha chain for one of the low abundance fibrillar collagens. Fibrillar collagen molecules are trimers that can be composed of one or more types of alpha chains. Type V collagen is found in tissues containing type I collagen and appears to regulate the assembly of heterotypic fibers composed of both type I and type V collagen. This gene product is closely related to type XI collagen and it is possible that the collagen chains of types V and XI constitute a single collagen type with tissue-specific chain combinations. Mutations in this gene are associated with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, types I and II. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

COL5A2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, 2
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp

COL5A2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.43).

BP6

Variant 2-189051464-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-189051464-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 197452.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.31 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000631 (96/152122) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00217 (90/41502). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00181. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 45 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 96 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
COL5A2	NM_000393.5 link	c.2787G>A	p.Ala929Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 42 of 54	ENST00000374866.9	NP_000384.2	P05997
COL5A2	XM_011510573.4 link	c.2649G>A	p.Ala883Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 45 of 57		XP_011508875.1
COL5A2	XM_047443251.1 link	c.2649G>A	p.Ala883Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 47 of 59		XP_047299207.1
COL5A2	XM_047443252.1 link	c.2649G>A	p.Ala883Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 46 of 58		XP_047299208.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
COL5A2	ENST00000374866.9 link	c.2787G>A	p.Ala929Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 42 of 54	1	NM_000393.5	ENSP00000364000.3		P05997
COL5A2	ENST00000618828.1 link	c.1626G>A	p.Ala542Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 35 of 47	5		ENSP00000482184.1		A0A087WYX9

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000632

AC:

AN:

152004

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00217

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000262

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000232

AC:

AN:

245422

AF XY:

0.000241

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00257

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000300

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000111

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000359

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000597

AC:

AN:

1456948

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000593

AC XY:

AN XY:

724704

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00166

AC:

AN:

33206

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000365

AC:

AN:

43870

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

25736

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000505

AC:

AN:

39568

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

85674

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53216

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5706

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000811

AC:

AN:

1109860

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000832

AC:

AN:

60112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.485

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000631

AC:

AN:

152122

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000605

AC XY:

AN XY:

74394

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00217

AC:

AN:

41502

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000262

AC:

AN:

15282

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.000193

AC:

AN:

5170

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4822

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10602

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000147

AC:

AN:

67956

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.509

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000379

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000703

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:2

Aug 10, 2023

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 22, 2015

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:2

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

Nov 04, 2021

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection

Benign:1

Apr 13, 2020

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

COL5A2-related disorder

Benign:1

May 05, 2021

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type 7A

Benign:1

Jun 14, 2016

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, 2

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, 1

Benign:1

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.43

CADD

Benign

0.058

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.54

PhyloP100

-1.3

Mutation Taster

=88/12

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over