chr2-189075430-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 1P and 9B. PP3BP6BS1BS2

The NM_000393.5(COL5A2):c.1067G>A(p.Arg356Gln) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000623 in 1,605,778 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000062 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

COL5A2
NM_000393.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 6.11

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

COL5A2 (HGNC:2210): (collagen type V alpha 2 chain) This gene encodes an alpha chain for one of the low abundance fibrillar collagens. Fibrillar collagen molecules are trimers that can be composed of one or more types of alpha chains. Type V collagen is found in tissues containing type I collagen and appears to regulate the assembly of heterotypic fibers composed of both type I and type V collagen. This gene product is closely related to type XI collagen and it is possible that the collagen chains of types V and XI constitute a single collagen type with tissue-specific chain combinations. Mutations in this gene are associated with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, types I and II. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

COL5A2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, 2
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp

COL5A2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.

PP3

MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.764

BP6

Variant 2-189075430-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-189075430-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 529253.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAdExome4 allele frequency = 0.00000619 (9/1453734) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.0000698 (6/85964). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00003. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAdExome4. There are 6 alleles in the male GnomAdExome4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 27. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 9 AD gene.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000393.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected	Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
	COL5A2	NM_000393.5	MANE Select	c.1067G>A	p.Arg356Gln	missense	Exon 17 of 54	NP_000384.2

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected	Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
	COL5A2	ENST00000374866.9	TSL:1 MANE Select	c.1067G>A	p.Arg356Gln	missense	Exon 17 of 54	ENSP00000364000.3
	COL5A2	ENST00000618828.1	TSL:5	c.358+3650G>A		intron	N/A	ENSP00000482184.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00000658

AC:

AN:

152044

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00000797

AC:

AN:

251066

AF XY:

0.0000147

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00000619

AC:

AN:

1453734

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00000829

AC XY:

AN XY:

723712

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000300

AC:

AN:

33282

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000224

AC:

AN:

44670

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26022

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39528

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000698

AC:

AN:

85964

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53336

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5748

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

9.05e-7

AC:

AN:

1105096

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

60088

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.419

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00000658

AC:

AN:

152044

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00

AC XY:

AN XY:

74252

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41380

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15262

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5184

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4820

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10604

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000147

AC:

AN:

68008

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2092

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.875

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000187

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000227

ExAC

AF:

0.00000824

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1

Jan 31, 2023

GeneDx

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Identified in homozygous state in a patient with a complex congenital heart defect and heterotaxy (Jin et al., 2017); this patient harbored several additional cardiogenetic variants; Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 28991257)

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, 1

Benign:1

Jan 27, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.10

BayesDel_addAF

Uncertain

0.047

BayesDel_noAF

Uncertain

0.010

CADD

Pathogenic

(source)

DANN

Pathogenic

1.0

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.66

Eigen

Uncertain

0.57

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.59

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.99

LIST_S2

Pathogenic

0.98

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.17

MetaRNN

Pathogenic

0.76

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.63

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.37

PhyloP100

6.1

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.66

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-2.6

REVEL

Uncertain

0.59

Sift

Benign

0.031

Sift4G

Benign

0.18

Polyphen

0.99

Vest4

0.55

MutPred

0.34

Loss of methylation at R356 (P = 0.0077)

MVP

0.83

MPC

0.96

ClinPred

0.77

GERP RS

5.2

Varity_R

0.37

gMVP

0.28

Mutation Taster

=91/9

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over